Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:33:30.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further Study of the Effect of Group Size on Student Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

A. A. Sutko
A. A. Sutko*
Affiliation:
Manufacturing Engineering Technology, Midwestern State University, 3410 Taft Blvd., Wichita Falls, TX 76308, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

In a 1992 issue of the International Journal of Engineering Education, this author reported on the effects of laboratory group size on student performance. Most of the information was obtained from a material science laboratory. The data indicate that individuals in groups of two or four students tended to receive better final course grades than those from groups of three. Discussion was given concerning the possible reasons for this finding along with information from the then current literature. This paper includes the key components of the 1992 paper and updates it with data obtained since then. It also includes information from other literature published in the recent past. The conclusions reached in the 1992 paper appear to remain valid.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 632: Symposium HH – Materials Science and Engineering Education in the New Millenium , 2000 , HH3.6
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sutko, A. A., Int. J. Engng Ed. 8, (3), 189–191 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Hallinan, M. and Sorensen, A., Am. J. Ed. 94, 71–78 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Cahen, L., Class Size and Instruction, (Longman 1983), pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
4. Mueller, D., Chase, C., Walden, J., Ed. Leadership, 45, 48–50 (1988).Google Scholar
5. McGiverin, J., Gilman, D., Tillitsk, C., The Elementary School J., 90, 47–56 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Preece, P., J. Ed. Res. 80, 377–379 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Gibbs, G., Haigh, M., Lucas, L., J. Geography in Higher Ed., 20, (2), 181–192 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Wilkerson, L., New Directions for Teaching and Learning 68, 23–32 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Schoenecker, T., Martell, K., Michlitsch, J., Res. In Higher Ed. 38, (4), 479–495 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Walker, A., Family Relations 45, 327–335 (1996).Google Scholar