Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:43:16.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Functionally gradient PECVD Ti(C,N) coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. Shieh
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Sci. and Eng., NCKU, Tainan, Taiwan, [email protected]
H. L. Wang
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Sci. and Eng., NCKU, Tainan, Taiwan, [email protected]
M. S. Tsai
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Sci. and Eng., NCKU, Tainan, Taiwan, [email protected]
M. H. Hon
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Sci. and Eng., NCKU, Tainan, Taiwan, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Ti(C,N) hard coating is well known as a suitable material for protecting substrate, and functionally gradient design is a method to improve the performance of it. In this study, functionally gradient Ti(C,N) coatings were performed by the technique of capacitive RF PECVD based on the investigation of Ti(C,N) monolayers with different C and N ratios. The results show that the composition and growth rate of Ti(C,N) monolayers are influenced by the nitrogen/methane ratio as other deposition parameters are fixed. A model is also proposed from the results obtained and is employed to calculate the reaction gas ratio and duration time needed for deposition in the gradient coating. The elements of Ti and N in the gradient coatings were analyzed by Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and revealed that the composition changed linearly as designed. The residual stress of the gradient coatings was also measured to show that the gradient design provides the possibility for adjusting the stress distribution of PECVD hard coatings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Porat, R., Surf Eng., 8, p.292 (1992)Google Scholar
2. Renji, Z., Ziwei, L., Zhouping, C. and Qi, S., Wear, 147, p. 227 (1991)Google Scholar
3. Vancoille, E., Celis, J. P. and Roos, J. R., Tribology International, 26, 115 (1993)Google Scholar
4. Holleck, H. and Schier, V., Surf. Coat. Techn., 76–77, p.328 (1995)Google Scholar
5. Erouglu, S. and Gallois, B., Surf Coat. Techn., 49, p.275 (1991)Google Scholar
6. Godse, R. V. and Santhanam, A. T., Mat. Sci. Eng., A209, p. 384 Google Scholar
7. Rie, K.-T., Gebauer, A., and Whole, J., Surf. Coat. Techn., 60, p.385 (1993)Google Scholar
8. Rie, K.-T., Gebauer, A., Whole, J., Tonshoff, H. K., Blawit, C., Surf Coat. Techn., 74–75, p.371 (1995)Google Scholar
9. Tonshoff, H. K. and Blawit, C., Surf Coat. Techn., 93, p. 119 (1997)Google Scholar
10. Lelogeais, M. and Ducarroir, M., Surf Coat. Tech., 48, p.121 (1991)Google Scholar