Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:54:02.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ftir Studies of Water and Ammonia Decomposition on Silicon Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

A.C. Dillon
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemistry, Stanford University Stanford, California 94305
P. Gupta
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemistry, Stanford University Stanford, California 94305
M.B. Robinson
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemistry, Stanford University Stanford, California 94305
A.S. Bracker
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemistry, Stanford University Stanford, California 94305
S.M. George
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemistry, Stanford University Stanford, California 94305
Get access

Abstract

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) transmission spectroscopy. was used to monitor the decomposition of H2O (D2O) and NH3(ND3) on silicon surfaces. Experiments were performed in-situ in an ultra-high vacuum (UHV) chamber using high surface area poroussilicon samples. The FTIR spectra revealed that H2O dissociates upon adsorption at 300K to form SiH and SiNH2 surface species. NH3 also issociates upon adsorption at 300 K to form SiH and SiOH2 species. Silicon samples with saturation exposures of H2O and NH3 were progressively annealed from 300 K to 860 K. The FTIR spectra of an H2O-saturated silicon surface revealed that the SiOH species decomposed to form a silicon oxide species and additional surface hydrogen between 460 K and 580 K. Likewise, the SiNH2 species decomposed between 540 K and 660 K to produce silicon nitride and additional surface hydrogen. In both cases, the Sill surface species decreased as H2 desorption from the silicon surface was observed above 700 K.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Chabal, Y.J., Phys. Rev. B 29, 3677 (1984).Google Scholar
2 Schumann, P.A. Jr., Keenan, W.A., Tong, A.H., Gegenwarth, H.H. and Schneider, C.P., J. Electrochem. Soc. 118, 145 (1971).Google Scholar
3 Collins, R.J. and Fan, H.Y., Phys. Rev. 93, 674 (1954).Google Scholar
4 Uhlir, A., Bell Syst. Tech. J. 35, 333 (1956).Google Scholar
5 Turner, D.R., J. Electrochem. Soc. 105,402 (1958).Google Scholar
6 Chuang, S.F., Collins, S.D. and Smith, R.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 675 (1989).Google Scholar
7 Bomchil, G., Herino, R., Barla, K. and Pfister, J.C., J. Electrochem. Soc. 130, 1611 (1983).Google Scholar
8 Gupta, P., Colvin, V.L. and George, S.M, Phys. Rev. 37, 8234 (1988).Google Scholar
9 Shulze, G. and Henzler, M., Surf. Sci. 124, 336 (1983).Google Scholar
10 Koehler, B.G., Mak, C.H., Coon, P.A., Arthur, D.A. and George, S.M., J. Chem. Phys. 89, 1709 (1988).Google Scholar
11 Gupta, P., Dillon, A.C., Bracker, A.S. and George, S.M., Surface Science (in press).Google Scholar
12 Dillon, A.C., Gupta, P., Robinson, M.B., Bracker, A.S. and George, S.M., Submitted to J. Vac. Sci. Technol.Google Scholar
13 Gupta, P., Dillon, A.C., Coon, P.A. and George, S.M., Chem. Phys. Lett.(in press).Google Scholar
14 Hardman, R.W., Beale, M.I.J., Gasson, D.B., Keen, J.M., Pickering, C. and Robbins, D.J., Surf. Sci. 152, 1051 (1985).Google Scholar
15 George, S.M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 4, 2394 (1986).Google Scholar
16 Avouris, Ph., Bozso, F. and Hamers, R.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B5, 1387 (1987).Google Scholar
17 Hamers, R. J., Avouris, Ph. and Bozso, F., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A6, 508 (1988).Google Scholar
18 Dresser, M.J., Taylor, P.A., Wallace, R.M., Choyke, W.J. and Yates, J.T. Jr., Surf. Sci. 218, 75 (1989).Google Scholar