Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:29:22.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Flexible to Hard Polyurethane Aerogels: The Effect of Molecular Functionality vs. Molecular Rigidity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2012

Chakkaravarthy Chidambareswarapattar
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, U.S.A. ([email protected]; [email protected])
Jared M. Loebs
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, U.S.A. ([email protected])
Zachary J. Larimore
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, U.S.A. ([email protected])
Patrick M. McCarver
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, U.S.A. ([email protected]; [email protected])
Autumn M. Kosbar
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, U.S.A. ([email protected]; [email protected])
Lokesh Dharani
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, U.S.A. ([email protected])
Huiyang Luo
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, U.S.A. ([email protected])
Hongbing Lu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, U.S.A. ([email protected])
Chariklia Sotiriou-Leventis
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, U.S.A. ([email protected]; [email protected])
Nicholas Leventis
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, U.S.A. ([email protected]; [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

High performance all-polymer aerogels are not only interesting for their low thermal conductivity, but also for their mechanical strength and their conversion to porous carbons. The prevalent design rule dictates that crosslinking at the monomer level decreases solubility of the developing polymer and induces phase separation of nanoparticles with high surface to volume ratios. Hence, hyperbranched structures based on trifunctional single aromatic core monomers should have enhanced interparticle connectivity and rigidity compared to those based on either difunctional or multiple aromatic core monomers. That design rule is applied here to hyperbranched polyurethane (PU) aerogels synthesized from tris(4-isocyanatophenyl)methane (TIPM) and 1,1,1-tris(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethane (HPE) in anhydrous acetone using dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) as catalyst. The resulting materials vary from highly flexible to rigid as the monomer concentration increases. FTIR and 13C solid NMR confirm formation of urethane. SEM shows that the flexible variety is macroporous with a beaded worm-like structure, while the rigid variety is mesoporous and nanoparticulate. Lower-density flexible aerogels are highly porous (92%) with surface area of 132 m2 g-1, while the rigid ones have higher surface areas, up to 256 m2 g-1. Polyurethane aerogels from other triols and diols, e.g., phloroglucinol (POL) and resorcinol (RES), respectively, have also been studied and for similar monomer concentrations shrinkage and bulk density increases.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kistler, S. S., J. Phys. Chem. 36, 5263 (1932).Google Scholar
2. Pierre, A. C. and Pajonk, G. M., Chem. Rev. 102, 42434265 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Leventis, N. and Lu, H., “Polymer Crosslinked Aerogels,” in Aerogels Handbook, Advanced in Sol-Gel Derived Materials and Technologies, Aegerter, M. A., Leventis, N. and Koebel, M. M. Ed.s, (Springer, 2011) pp. 251286.Google Scholar
4. Leventis, N., Sotiriou-Leventis, C., Chandrasekaran, N., Mulik, S., Larimore, Z. J., Lu, H., Churu, G. and Mang, J. T., Chem. Mater. 22, 66926710 (2010).Google Scholar
5.(a)Chidambareswarapattar, C., Larimore, Z., Sotiriou-Leventis, C., Mang, J. T. and Leventis, N., J. Mater. Chem. 20, 96669678 (2010). N. Leventis, C. Sotiriou-Leventis, D. P. Mohite, Z. J. Larimore, J. T. Mang, G. Churu and H. Lu, Chem. Mater. 23, 2250-2261 (2011). (b) N. Leventis, C. Chidambareswarapattar, D. P. Mohite, Z. J. Larimore, H. Lu and C. Sotiriou-Leventis, J. Mater. Chem. 21, 11981–11986 (2011).Google Scholar
6. Mourey, T. H., Turner, S. R., Robinstein, M., Frechet, J. M. J., Hawker, C. J. and Wooley, K. L., Macromolecules 25, 24012406 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Biesmans, G., Mertens, A., Duffours, L., Woignier, T. and Phalippou, J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 225, 6468 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Rigacci, A., Marechal, J. C., Repoux, M., Moreno, M. and Achard, P., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 350, 372378 (2004).Google Scholar
9. Smith, H. A., J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 7, 8595 (1963).Google Scholar
10. McCarthy, S. J., Meijs, G. F., Mitchell, N., Gunatillake, P. A., Heath, G., Brandwood, A. and Schindhelm, K., Biomaterials 18, 13871409 (1997).Google Scholar
11.(a)Luo, H. and Chen, W., Intern. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 1, 254260 (2004). (b) H. Luo, W. Chen and A. M. Rajendran, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89, 266–273 (2006).Google Scholar