Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:19:09.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fracture Characteristics of Metal-Intermetallic Laminates Produced by SHS Reactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

D. E. Alman  and
J. C. Rawers
D. E. Alman
Affiliation:
U.S. Bureau of Mines, Albany Research Center, Albany, Oregon 97321
J. C. Rawers
Affiliation:
U.S. Bureau of Mines, Albany Research Center, Albany, Oregon 97321
Get access

Abstract

The tensile behavior of metal-intermetallic layered composites produced by reacting dissimilar elemental foils was studied by U.S. Bureau of Mines researchers. The layered composites were produced by initiating an SHS reaction between Ni and Al foils or Ti and Al foils. The reaction consumed the aluminum foil, resulting in well bonded metal (Ni or Ti) metalaluminide layered composites. Tensile tests revealed that the tensile behavior of the composites was dependent upon the thickness of the intermetallic layer (which in the present case corresponds directly to volume fraction). Composites, in which the intermetallic layers had cracked extensively, behaved in a ductile or tough manner. Not surprisingly, these composites consisted of a relatively thick metal layer compared to the intermetallic layer. It was found that the cracking of the intermetallic layers occurred prior to the deformation of the metal layer. Those composites that had relatively thick intermetallic layers, compared to the metal layer, behaved in a brittle manner. These composites had few cracks in the intermetallic region.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 350: Symposium U – Intermetallic Matrix Composites III , 1994 , 53
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Stoloff, N.S. and Alman, D.E., in Intermetallic Matrix Composites, edited by Anton, D.L., Martin, P.L., Miracle, D.B. and McMeeking, R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 194, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990) pp. 31–43.Google Scholar
2. Hardwick, D.A. and Cordi, R.C., in Intermetallic Matrix Composites, edited by Anton, D.L., Martin, P.L., Miracle, D.B. and McMeeking, R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 194, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990) pp. 65–70.Google Scholar
3. Rowe, R.G. and Skelly, D.W., in Intermetallic Matrix Comosites, edited by Miracle, D.B., Anton, D.L. and Graves, J.A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 273, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) pp. 411–416.Google Scholar
4. Alman, D.E., Shaw, K.G., Stoloff, N.S. and Rajan, K., Mater. Sci. Engr., A 155, 85 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Rawers, J.C., Alman, D.E. and Hawk, J.A., IntL I. Self-Prop. High-Temp. Synthesis, 2 (1), 12 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Alman, D.E., Hawk, J.A., Petty, A.V. and Rawers, J.C., JOM, 46 (3), 31 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Alman, D.E., Rawers, J.C. and Hawk, J.A., submitted to Met. Trans., 1994.Google Scholar
8. Rawers, J.C., Hansen, J.S., Alman, D.E. and Hawk, J.A., submitted to J. Mater. Sci. Letters, 1993.Google Scholar
9. Alman, D.E. and Stoloff, N.S., submitted to Met. Trans., (1994).Google Scholar
10. Alman, D.E., Ph.D.Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 1992.Google Scholar