Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:41:44.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fluorescence Quenching Based Thin Film Sensors Employing Electrostatic Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Soo-Hyoung Lee
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials, Department of Chemistry and Physics, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854
J. Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Physics, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854
S. K. Tripathy
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials, Department of Chemistry and Physics, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854
Get access

Abstract

In this work, the fabrication and performance of thin film optical chemical sensors based on the fluorescence quenching of indicator molecules by several analytes such as organic nitro compounds or metal ions are described. To fabricate the sensors, a fluorescent molecule, 1- hydroxypyrene-3,6,8-trisulfonate or pyrene methanol, was covalently incorporated into poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) and subsequently the polymers were assembled with a polycation employing electrostatic layer-by-layer self-assembly into thin film structures. Fluorescence intensities decreased with increasing concentration of analytes. Quenching behavior follows Stern-Volmer bimolecular quenching kinetics. Linear increase in absorbance, film thickness and emission intensity was observed with increase in number of bilayers deposited in all multilayer films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ji, J.; Rosenzweig, Z., Anal. Chim. Acta 397, 93 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Walkup, G. K., Imperiali, B., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 3443 (1997).Google Scholar
3. Kim, J., Wu, X., Herman, M. R., Dordick, J. S., Anal. Chim. Acta 370, 251 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Turro, N. J., Modern Molecular Photochemistry, The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co. Inc., Menlo Park, 1978, pp246247.Google Scholar
5. Demas, J. N., DeGraff, B. A., Xu, W., Anal. Chem. 67, 1377 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Decher, G., Lvov, Y., Schmitt, J., Thin Solid Films. 244, 772 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Harris, J. J., DeRose, P. M., Bruening, M. L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 1978 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Lee, S-H., Kumar, J., Tripathy, S. K., Langmuir 16, 10482 (2000).Google Scholar
9. Lee, S-H., Balasubramanian, S., Kim, D. Y., Viswanathan, N. K., Bian, S., Kumar, J., Tripathy, S. K, Macromolecules 33, 6534 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Ariga, K., Lvov, Y., Kunitake, T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 224 (1997).Google Scholar