Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:51:25.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First-Principles Simulations and Z-Contrast Imaging of Impurities at <001> Tilt Grain Boundaries in Mgo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Y. Yan
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
M. F. Chisholm
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
G. Duscher
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Department of Physics (M/C 273), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607
S. J. Pennycook
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
A. Maiti
Affiliation:
Molecular Simulations Inc., 8 N. E. Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803–5297
S. T. Pantelides
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235
Get access

Abstract

First-principles density-functional calculations were used to study the effects of Ca impurities on the Σ=5 (310) <001> tilt grain boundaries in MgO. An equilibrium structure and two metastable structures of the grain boundaries in pure MgO have been established. The calculations further demonstrated that Ca impurities segregate at particular sites in the metastable grain boundary and induce a structural transformation. This result is consistent with atomic resolution Z-contrast imaging. The calculations also found that the impurities at the grain boundaries do not induce states in the band gap. The mechanism of the transformation is also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Vitek, V. and Wang, G.J., Surf. Sci., 144, 110 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Sickafus, K.E. and Sass, S.L., Acta Mettall., 35, 69 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Lin, C.H. and Sass, S.L., Script Metall., 22, 735 (1988),Google Scholar
Lin, C.H. and Sass, S.L., Script Metall., 22, 735 (1988), p1569.Google Scholar
4. Li, G.H. and Zhang, L.D., Scripta Mettall., 32, 1335 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Sutton, A.P. and Balluffi, R.W., Interfaces in Crystalline Materials (Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, 1995) and references there in.Google Scholar
6. Hohenberg, P. and Kohn, W., Phys. Rev., B136, 864 (1964).Google Scholar
7. Perdew, J.P. and Zunger, A., Phys. Rev., B23, 5048 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Payne, M.C., Teter, M.P., Allen, D.C., Arias, T.A. and Joannopoulos, J.D., Rev. Mod. Phys., 64, 1045 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Kingery, W.D., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 57, 1 (1974).Google Scholar
10. Duffy, D.M., P.W., and Tasker, , Phil. Mag., A 47, 817 (1983).Google Scholar
11. Harris, D.J., Watson, G.W. and Parker, S.C., Phil. Mag., A 74 407 (1996).Google Scholar
12. Kizuka, T., Iijima, M. and Tanaka, N., Proc. of Microscopy and Microanalysis, 674 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Merkle, K.L. and Smith, D.J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 59, 2887 (1987).Google Scholar
14. Tasker, P. W., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 86, 1311 (1990).Google Scholar
15. Altermatt, A. and Brown, I.D., Acta Cryst. B41, 240 (1985).Google Scholar
16. Brown, I.D. and Altermatt, D., Acta Cryst. B41, 244 (1985).Google Scholar
17. Schonberger, U. and Aryasetiawan, F., Phys. Rev., B52, 8788 (1995).Google Scholar