Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:31:14.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First-principles Modeling of Co/SrTiO3/Co Magnetic Tunnel Junctions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

I.I. Oleinik ,
E.Y. Tsymbal  and
D.G. Pettifor
I.I. Oleinik
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, UK
E.Y. Tsymbal
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, UK
D.G. Pettifor
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, UK
Get access

Abstract

The atomic and electronic structure of Co/SrTiO3/Co (001) magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) was investigated by first-principles density-functional theory. We considered different interface terminations and the most stable structure with the TiO2 termination has been identified based on energetics of adhesion. The electronic structure of the TiO2-erminated MTJ shows an exchange coupling between the interface Co and Ti atoms mediated by oxygen. This coupling induces the magnetic moment of 0.25 μB on the interface Ti atom, which is aligned antiparallel to the magnetic moment of the Co layer. We argue that this might cause the inversion of the spin polarization of tunneling across the SrTiO3 barrier that was found in recent experiments.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 690: Symposium F – Spintronics , 2001 , F2.6
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Moodera, J.S., Nassar, J., and Mathon, G., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 29, 381 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Julliere, M., Phys. Lett. A 54, 225 (1975).Google Scholar
3. Zhang, S. and Levy, P.M., Eur.Phys. J. B, 10, 599 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Itoh, H., Shibata, A., Kumazaki, T., Inoue, J., and Maekawa, S., J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 68, 1632 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Mavropoulos, Ph., Papanikolaou, N., and Dederichs, P.H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1088 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Butler, W.H., Zhang, X.G., Schulthess, T.C., and MacLaren, J.M., Phys. Rev. B 63, 54416 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Teresa, J.M. De, Barthelemy, A., Fert, A., Contour, J.P., Montaigne, F., Seneor, P., and Vaures, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4288 (1999); Science 286, 507 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Oleinik, I.I., Tsymbal, E.Y., and Pettifor, D.G., Phys. Rev. B 62, 8500 (2000).Google Scholar
9. King-Smith, R.D. and Vanderbilt, D., Phys. Rev. B 49, 5828 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Kanamori, J., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 10, 87 (1959).Google Scholar
11. LeClair, P., Kohlhepp, J.T., Swagten, H.J.M., and Jonge, W.J.M. de, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1066 (2001); P. LeClair, B.Hoex, H.Wieldraaijer, J.T. Kohlhepp, H.J.M.Swagten, and W.J.M.de Jonge, Phys. Rev. B 64, 100406 (2001).Google Scholar