Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:39:39.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fib/Tem Analysis of Paint Layers from Thomas Eakins' TheCrucifixion, 1880

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Andrew Lins
Affiliation:
Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, PA
Lucille A. Giannuzzi
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida, Mechanical Materials and Aerospace Engineering, Orlando, FL
Frederick A. Stevie
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Beth Price
Affiliation:
Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, PA
Mark Tucker
Affiliation:
Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, PA
Nica Gutman
Affiliation:
Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, PA
Get access

Abstract

Many issues in the examination, treatment, and authentication of works of art depend on the accurate characterization of thin layers, which may challenge the resolution and detection limits of instrumentation routinely used for analyses, particularly SEM-EDS and EPMA. Such thin layers are the focus of recent conservation analysis in preparation for a major retrospective of Thomas Eakins' works. Interpretation of Eakins' paintings has often been complicated by mechanical and chemical cleaning procedures performed after the artist's death in 1916.

Recent advances in Focused Ion Beam (FIB) technology provide means for preparing specimens of thin layers that can be analyzed directly by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) yielding resolution in the nanometer range or better. This paper describes initial work undertaken to elucidate the inorganic components in the uppermost paint layers from Eakins' The Crucifixion, completed in 1880. Using TEM, we have observed a 250-500 nm Pb-rich nanocrystalline region, a pigment free zone less than 2 μm thick, and a lead white paint layer. An analysis of samples from two paintings that were subjected to mild cleaning operations did not show comparable Pb-rich nanocrystals. These results suggest that The Crucifixion may have been subjected to a more aggressive cleaning treatment which caused the entrainment of the Pbrich material–not resolvable by traditional analytical techniques – at the painting's surface. The use of FIB/TEM has enabled clear identification of the thin paint surface layers and offers enormous promise for understanding the processing and alteration of artists' materials, including issues of authentication.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Foster, K. A., “Eakins and the Academy,” Thomas Eakins, organized by Sewell, D., (Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, PA, 2001), pp.95106.Google Scholar
2. Goodrich, L., Thomas Eakins: His Life and Work, (Whitney Museum of American Art, New York, 1933), p.146–49.Google Scholar
3. Tucker, M. and Gutman, N., “The Pursuit of ‘True Tones’ in the Paintings of Thomas Eakins,” in Eakins, Thomas, Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, PA, 2001, pp 353365 and notes 10–14, p.425.Google Scholar
. Giannuzzi, L.A., Brown, S.R., Irwin, R.B., and Stevie, F.A., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, andreson, R.M. and Walck, S.D., eds., Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 480, 19 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Giannuzzi, L.A. and Stevie, F.A., Micron, vol. 30, No. 3, (1999) p. 197204.Google Scholar
6. Stevie, F.A., Vartuli, C.B., Giannuzzi, L.A., Shofner, T. L., Brown, S. R., Rossie, B., Hillion, F., Mills, R. H., Antonell, M., Irwin, R.B., and Purcell, B. M., Surface Interface Analysis, (2001), 31, 345351.Google Scholar
7. White, H. J., Pu, Y., Rafailovich, M., Sokolov, J., King, A. H., Giannuzzi, L. A., Urbanik-Shannon, C., Kempshall, B.W., Eisenberg, A., Schwarz, S. A., Strzhemechny, Y. M., Polymer, v 42 n 4 Feb 2000. p 16131619.Google Scholar
8. Heaney, Peter J., Vicenzi, Edward P., Giannuzzi, Lucille A., and Livi, Kenneth J.T., American Mineralogist, 86, (2001), 10941099.Google Scholar