Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:35:21.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fabrication/Characterization of a Pseudomorphic Ga0.1In0.9P/InP MESFET

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

M. S. Feng
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Science & Enguneering, Hsinchu, Taiwan, R. O., China
Y. M. Hsin
Affiliation:
Institute of Electronics, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, R. O., China
C. H. Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, R. O., China
Get access

Abstract

A pseudomorphic Ga0.1In0.9P/InP MESFET grown by low pressure metalorganic chemical vapor deposition(LP-MOCVD) has been fabricated and characterized. The results indicated a transconductance of 66.7 ms/mm and a saturation drain current (Idss) of 55.6 mA have been achieved; furthermore, the Schottky barrier on InGaP as high as 0.67eV can be obtained using Pt2Si as the gate material. For comparison, a conventional InP MESFET with 5μm gate length has also been fabricated on InP epitaxial layer grown by low pressure metalorganic chemical vapor deposition on Fe-doped semi-insulating InP substrate. The transconductance and Idss were found to be 46.7 mS/mm and 43.1 mA at zero gate, respectively, for the depletion mode n-channel MESFET with Au as the gate metal; whereas, for the MESFET using Pt2Si as the gate metal, a transconductance of 40.3 mS/mm and a saturation drain current of 41.1 mA at zero gate bias have been obtained. The results indicated that Ga0.1In0.9P/lnP MESFET has better performance than InP MESFET because of higher energy gap of Ga0.1In0.9P.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Eizenberg, M., Heiblum, M., Nathan, M. I., Braslau, N., and Mooney, P. M., J. Appl. Phys. 61,1516(1987).Google Scholar
[2] Loualiche, S., Ginudi, A., Corre, A. Le, Lecrosnier, D., Vaudry, C., Henry, L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 2099(1989).Google Scholar
[3] Chan, Y. J., Pavlidis, D., Razeghi, M., Omnes, F., IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices. 37,10, 2141(1990).Google Scholar
[4] Kuech, T. F., Mccaldin, J. O., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 17(5), 891(1980).Google Scholar