Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:15:32.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fabrication of Organic Thin Film Transistors Using Low Temperature, Soluble Silicon Oxide as the Gate Dielectrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Jeng-Hua Wei
Affiliation:
[email protected], Ching Yun University, Electronic Engineering, 229, Chien Hsin Rd., Jung-Li, Taiwan, 320, Taiwan
HorngJiunn Lin
Affiliation:
[email protected], Ching Yun University, Electronic Engineering, 229, Chien Hsin Rd., Jung-Li, Taiwan, 320, Taiwan
Ying-Ren Chen
Affiliation:
[email protected], Ching Yun University, Electronic Engineering, 229, Chien Hsin Rd., Jung-Li, Taiwan, 320, Taiwan
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, a unique water-based, liquid phase deposited silicon oxide (LPD SiO2) is adapted to the fabrication process of the organic thin film transistor (OTFT). Through the use of this process, an OTFT with a silicon oxide gate insulator is successfully fabricated at 100°C or less. At this low process temperature, the SiO2 functions efficiently as a gate dielectric with the breakdown field being larger than 5 MV/cm, the leakage current being near 1 pA/um2 with a gate bias of 20 V and the surface roughness being less than 1nm. Due to the high quality silicon oxide, the oxide-gated OTFT shows the low threshold voltage (-1 ∼ -2V) and medium on/off current ratio (∼1000). Because this oxide is a water-based process, it is highly resistant to the following soluble semiconductor material and its solvent.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Bao, Z., Adv. Mater No 3, 227 (2000).Google Scholar
[2] Zschieschang, U., Klank, H., Halik, M., Schmid, G., and Dehm, C., Adv. Mater No 14,1147 (2003).Google Scholar
[3] Klank, H., Halik, M., Zschieschang, U., Eder, F., Schmid, G., and Dehm, C., Appl. Phys. Lett., 82, 4715 (2003).Google Scholar
[4] Shaw, J. M., Seidler, P. F., IBM J. Res. & Dev. 45, 3 (2001).Google Scholar
[5] Dimitrakopoulos, C. D. and Mascaro, D. J., IBM J. Res. & Dev. 45, 11 (2001).Google Scholar
[6] Chou, J. S. and Lee, S. C., Appl. Phys. Lett., 64, 1971(1994).Google Scholar
[7] Wei, J. H. and Lee, S. C., J. Electrochem. Soc., 144, 1870 (1997).Google Scholar
[8] Sze, S.M., “Physics of semiconductor devices”, Wiley, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
[9] Lo, P.Y., Pei, Z., Hwang, J.J. and Chan, Y.J., submitted to the 2005 International Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials (SSDM 2005).Google Scholar
[10] Snow, E. S., Campbell, P. M., Ancona, M. G. and Novak, J. P. Appl. Phys. Lett., 86, 033105 (2005).Google Scholar
[11] Bo, X. –Z., Lee, C. Y., Strano, M. S.. Goldfinger, M., Nuckolls, C., and Blanchet, G. B., Appl. Phys. Lett., 86, 182102 (2005).Google Scholar
[12] Duan, X., Wu, C., Sahi, W., Chen, J., Parce, J. W., Empedocles, S. and Goldman, J. L., Nature, 425, 274 (2003).Google Scholar
[13] Mitzi, D. B., Kosber, L. L., Murry, C. E., Copel, M., Afzali, A., Nature 428, 299 (2004).Google Scholar