Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:03:25.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fabrication Methods for Improved Electromechanical Behavior in Piezoelectric Membranes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

M.C. Robinson ,
P.D. Hayenga ,
J.H. Cho ,
C.D. Richards ,
R.F. Richards  and
D.F. Bahr
M.C. Robinson
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-2920
P.D. Hayenga
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-2920
J.H. Cho
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-2920
C.D. Richards
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-2920
R.F. Richards
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-2920
D.F. Bahr
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-2920
Get access

Abstract

Piezoelectric materials convert mechanical to electrical energy under stretching and bending conditions. Optimizing the coupling conversion is imperative to the electromechanical behavior of a micromachined membrane's performance. This paper discusses analytical calculations that were devised to determine the microscale structure that minimizes residual stress and outlines the implementation of fabrication technique variations including three different electrode configurations, trenching around the membrane, and reducing the total composite residual stress of the support structure using compressive silicon oxide. Lead zirconacte titanate (PZT) films between 1 and 3 μm thick with a ratio of Zr to Ti of 40:60 were deposited onto 3 mm square silicon membranes. The total tensile stress in the composite structure reaches 100 MPa during standard fabrication processing. Utilizing analytical calculations, a structure was determined that lowered the residual stress of the composite to 11 MPa and increased the electromechanical coupling 35 times. Changing the geometry of the electrode coverage decreased the residual stress of the composite by 40%. Trenching around the membrane provided a membrane with boundary conditions that approached simply supported and decreased the composite residual stress by another 16%. A comparison of the electromechanical behavior for these structures will be discussed, showing a route towards increasing electromechanical coupling in PZT MEMS.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 872: Symposium J – Micro- and Nanosystems—Materials and Devices , 2005 , J18.26
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hausler, E., Stein, L., Ferroelectronics 60 (1984) p. 277–282.Google Scholar
2 Kymissis, J., Kendall, C., Paradiso, J., Gershenfeld, N., Proceedings: Second IEEE International Conference on Wearable Computing, (1998) p. 132–139.Google Scholar
3 Whalen, S., Thompson, M., Bahr, D.F., Richards, C.D., Richards, R.F., Sensors and Actuators A104 (2003) p. 290–298.Google Scholar
4 Eakins, L.M.R., Olson, B.W., Richards, C.D., Richards, R.F., Bahr, D.F., Thin Solid Films 441 (2003) p. 180.Google Scholar
5 Bonnotte, E., Delobelle, P., Bornier, L., Journal of Materials Research 12, (1997) p.2234–2248 Google Scholar
6 Cho, J., Raupp, J., Anderson, M., Richards, R., Bahr, D., Richards, C., Submitted to the Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, (2005).Google Scholar
7 Kennedy, M.S., Olson, A.L., Raupp, J.C., Moody, N.R., Bahr, D.F., Microsystem Technologies Journal, Article In Press (2005).Google Scholar
8 Cho, J., MS Thesis, Washington State University, 2004.Google Scholar
9 Degen, A., Abedinov, N., Gotszalk, T., Sossna, E., Kratzenberg, M., Rangelow, I.W., Microelectronic Engineering 57-58 (2001) p. 425–432.Google Scholar