Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:49:27.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fabrication And Application Of Zeolite Membranes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Hidetoshi Kita*
Affiliation:
Department Of Advanced Materials Science And Engineering, Faculty Of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Tokiwadai 2–16–1, Ube, Yamaguchi 755–8611, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Zeolite Membranes Were Prepared On A Porous Ceramic Support By Hydrothermal Synthesis Using Conventional Heating System And Microwave Heating. Naa And T Type Zeolite Membranes Were Highly Selective For Permeating Water Preferentially With The High Permeation Flux, While Silicalite Membranes Exhibited Preferential Organic Compound Permeation From Water Such As Ethanol/Water. Nay And Nax Zeolite Membranes Showed A High Alcohol Selectivity For Several Feed Mixtures With Methanol Or Ethanol And A High Benzene Selectivity For Benzene/Cyclohexane And Benzene/N-Hexane Separation. The Performance Of The Zeolite Membranes Was The Most Favorable One For Pervaporation Membranes Which Have Been Published So Far And A Tubular Type Module Using A Type Zeolite Membrane For Dehydration Of Organic Liquids Has Been Put Into Industrial Operation. The Tubular Type Pervaporation And Vapor Permeation Module Can Produce 99.8 Wt% Ethanol From 600 L/H, 90 Wt% Ethanol Feed At 120 °C. For The Mass Production Of Zeolite Membrane A New Synthetic Method Using A Microwave Heating Is Also Proposed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stern, S. A. and Koros, W. J., Chimie Nouvelle, 18, 3201(2000).Google Scholar
2. Kanellopoulos, N. K., Ed., “Recent Advances in Gas Separation by Microporous Ceramic Membranes”, Elsevier, 2000.Google Scholar
3. Caro, J., Noack, M., Koelsch, P., and Schaefer, R., J. Memb. Sci. 38, 3(2000).Google Scholar
4. Kita, H., Horii, K., Ohtoshi, Y., Tanaka, K., and Okamoto, K., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 14, 206(1995).Google Scholar
5. Kita, H., Asamura, H., Tanaka, K., and Okamoto, K., ACS Symp. Ser. 744, 330(2000).Google Scholar
6. Morigami, Y., Kondo, M., Abe, J., Kita, H., and Okamoto, K., Sep. Purification Tech. 25, 251(2001).Google Scholar
7. Kita, H., Fuchida, K., Horita, T., Asamura, H., and Okamoto, K., Sep. Purification Tech. 25, 261(2001).Google Scholar
8. Lin, X., Kita, H., and Okamoto, K., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 40, 4069(2001).Google Scholar
9. Kita, H., Harada, T., Asamura, H., Tanaka, K., and Okamoto, K., Proc. 5th International Conference Inorg. Memb. ICIM'98, 1998, 318.Google Scholar
10. Okamoto, K., Kita, H., Horii, K., and Tanaka, K., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 40, 163(2001).Google Scholar
11. Breck, D.W., Ed., ‘Zeolite Molecular Sieves’, Wiley, NewYork, 1974.Google Scholar
12. Tanaka, K., Yoshikawa, R., Ying, C., Kita, H., and Okamoto, K., Catalysis Today, 67, 121(2001).Google Scholar
13. Fleming, H. L., Chem. Eng. Progr., 1992, July, 46.Google Scholar
14. Huang, R. Y. M., Ed., ‘Pervaporation Membrane Separation Processes’, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991.Google Scholar