Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:42:30.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Evidence of Super Densification of Adsorbed Hydrogen by in-situ Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2011

Dipendu Saha ,
Lilin He ,
Cristian I. Contescu ,
Nidia C. Gallego  and
Yuri B. Melnichenko
Dipendu Saha
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
Lilin He
Affiliation:
Neutron Scattering Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
Cristian I. Contescu
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
Nidia C. Gallego
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
Yuri B. Melnichenko
Affiliation:
Neutron Scattering Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
Get access

Abstract

Entrapping hydrogen molecules within the nanopores of solid adsorbents serves as a unique alternative for on-board storing of hydrogen for transportation purposes. The key advantage of the physisorption process for hydrogen storage is the higher density values achieved with the adsorbed gas, compared to that of the compressed phase, translating into higher storage capacities at lower pressures. The necessary condition for effective adsorption is the presence of narrow micropores of < 2 nm in width which provide the most suitable environment of hydrogen adsorption. Despite numerous theoretical calculations or indirect experimental estimations, there has not been a direct experimental measurement of the density of adsorbed hydrogen as a function of pressure and/or pore size. In the present study, we report on the use of in-situ small angle neutron scattering (SANS) to study the phase behavior of hydrogen confined in narrow micropores. We provide for the first time direct experimental measurements of the effect of pore size and pressure on hydrogen adsorbed on a polyfurfuryl alcohol-derived activated carbon (PFAC), at room temperature and pressures up to 207 bar. SANS studies were carried out at the General-Purpose Small-Angle Neutron Scattering spectrometer of the High Flux Isotope Reactor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The measurements covered the Q-range from 0.01 to 0.8 Å-1, covering the pores in the range of 9 to 34 Å of the PFAC material. Initial results suggest that the density of adsorbed hydrogen is higher than the density of bulk hydrogen gas and increases with decreasing pore size.

Keywords

absorbentabsorptionneutron scattering
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1334: Symposium N – Recent Developments in Materials for Hydrogen Storage and Carbon-Capture Technologies , 2011 , mrss11-1334-n03-13
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review10/st00a_stetson_2010_o_web.pdf. Google Scholar
2. Thomas, K.M., Catalysis Today 120, 389 (2007).Google Scholar
3. Benard, P., Chahine, R., Scripta Materialia 56, 803 (2007).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.01.008Google Scholar
4. Patchkovskii, S., Tse, J.S., Yurchenko, S.N., Zhechkov, L., Heine, T., Seifert, G., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 10439 (2005).Google Scholar
5. Aga, R.S., Fu, C.L., Krcmar, M., Morris, J.R., Phys Rev. B 76, 165404 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevB.76.165404Google Scholar
6. Cabria, I., Lopez, K.J., Alonso, J.A., Carbon 45, 2649 (2007).Google Scholar
7. Peng, L., Morris, J., J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 15522 (2010).Google Scholar
8. Gogotsi, Y., Portet, C., Osswald, S., Simmons, J.M., Yildrim, T., Laudision, G., Fisher, J.E., Intl. J. Hydrogen Energy 34, 6314 (2009).Google Scholar
9. de la Casa-lillo, M.A., Lamari-Dakrim, F., Cazorla-Amoros, D., Linares-Solano, A., J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 10930 (2002).10.1021/jp014543mGoogle Scholar
10. Burket, C.L., Rajagopalan, R., Marencic, A.P., Dronvajjala, K., Foley, H.C., Carbon 44, 2957 (2006).10.1016/j.carbon.2006.05.029Google Scholar
11. Melnichenko, Y.B.; Mayama, H.; Cheng, G.; Blach, T. Langmuir, 26, 6374 (2010).10.1021/la904032pGoogle Scholar
12. Melnichenko, Y.B.; Radlinski, A.P.; Mastalerz, M.; Cheng, G.; Rupp, J. Intl. J. of Coal Geology 77, 69 (2009).Google Scholar
13. Chathoth, S. M.; Mamontov, E.; Melnichenko, Y. B.; Zamponi, M. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 132, 148 (2010).Google Scholar