Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:58:59.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Approach to Study the Colloid Generation from the Bentonite Barrier to Quantify the Source Term and to Assess its Relevance on the Radionuclide Migration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2011

Ursula Alonso ,
Tiziana Missana  and
Miguel García-Gutiérrez
Ursula Alonso
Affiliation:
[email protected], CIEMAT, Environmental, Avda. Complutense 22, Edif. 19, Madrid, 28040, Spain, +34 913466183, +34 913466542
Tiziana Missana
Affiliation:
[email protected], CIEMAT, Environmental, Avda. Complutense 22, Madrid, 28040, Spain
Miguel García-Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
[email protected], CIEMAT, Environmental, Avda. Complutense 22, Madrid, 28040, Spain
Get access

Abstract

A geological repository for high-level radioactive waste (HLWR) consists on a multi-barrier system, emplaced hundred meters deep in a geological medium. In most of the repository concepts, the waste would be located in metal canisters surrounded by a layer of compacted clay, i.e. bentonite. To guarantee the long-term safety of a repository, all mechanisms that could affect the radionuclide (RN) migration rate must be well defined and quantified. The particular interest of this work lies on the possible contribution of bentonite colloids to RN transport. The first parameter necessary to assess the colloid-mediated transport is the quantification of the bentonite colloid source term. Secondly, it is necessary to define if colloids remain stable in the geochemical conditions of the medium.

Several mechanisms that are basically related to the hydration of the clay can lead to bentonite colloid generation. In the present work the colloid generation is evaluated at laboratory scale under “realistic” conditions, considering static hydration (no flow). To do so, two experimental set-ups were designed with the aim of quantifying the bentonite colloid generation rates. The experimental cells were designed to study the colloid formation in a confined system by introducing compacted bentonite, at different compactation densities, in stainless steel porous filters. The bentonite hydration is facilitated by immersing the confined cells in different electrolytes, from the most favorable conditions (lowest ionic strength) to different groundwaters of interest as aqueous phase. The concentration of bentonite colloids and the average particle size are evaluated as function of time by Photon Correlation Spectroscopy measurements in the aqueous phase.

Preliminary results showed that all the bentonite particles generated have average size in the colloid range, equivalent to that of bentonite colloids prepared in the laboratory, despite the filter porous sizes were hundred times higher. The experimental set up allows performing stability evaluation at the same time and that after months the colloids generated in the lower strength electrolytes remain stable. The configuration allows quantification of the colloid generation rates. The mechanisms responsible of colloid generation are discussed according to the obtained results in different experimental conditions.

Keywords

colloidwaste managementsurface chemistry
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 985: Symposium NN – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXX , 2006 , 0985-NN11-21
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Alonso, U., Missana, T., Geckeis, H., García-Gutiérrez, M., Turrero, M. J., Möri, R., Schäfer, T., Patelli, A., and Rigato, V., Journal of Iberian Geology 32, 79 (2006).Google Scholar
2. Hunter, R. J., ”Foundations of colloid Science I.” Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar
3. Ryan, J. N. and Elimelech, M., Colloids Surfaces A: 107, 1 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Pusch., R. SKB Technical Report TR 99–31, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden 1999.Google Scholar
5. Missana, T., Alonso, U., and Turrero, M. J., Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 61, 17 (2003).Google Scholar
6. Pusch., R. SKB Technical Report 85–14, SKB, Stockholm, Sweden, 1985.Google Scholar
7. Kallay, N., Barouch, E., and Matijevic, E., Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 27, 1 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Yariv, S. and Cross, H., ”Geochemistry of Colloid Systems,” p. 450. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979.Google Scholar
9. Sen, T. K. and Khilar, K. C., Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 119, 71 (2006).Google Scholar
10. Huertas, F., Fuentes-Cantillana, J. L., Jullien, F., Rivas, P., Linares, J., Fariña, P., Ghoreychi, M., Jockwer, N., Kickmayer, W., Martinez, M. A., Samper, J., Alonso, E., and Elorza, F. J., 2000.Google Scholar
11. Bradbury, M. H., Ed. NAGRA, 1989.Google Scholar
12. McCarthy, J. F. and Degueldre, C., in ”Environmental Particles”, Vol.2. Lewis Publishers, Boca Ratton, FL:, 1993.Google Scholar
13. Buffle, J. and Leppard, G. G., Environmental Science and Technology 29, 2176 (1995).Google Scholar
14. Ledin, A., Karlsson, S., Düker, A., and Allard, B., Anal. Chim. Acta 281, 421 (1993).Google Scholar
15. Holthoff, H., Egelhaaf, S. U., Borkovec, M., Shurtenberger, P., and Sticher, H., Langmuir 12, 5541 (1996).Google Scholar
17. Ryan, J. N. and Gschwend, P. M., Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 164, 21 (1994).Google Scholar
18. Grindrod, P., Peletier, M., and Takase, H., Engineering Geology. 54, 159 (1999).Google Scholar