Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:21:36.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Excimer Laser Induced Etching of Silicon-Carbide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

M. Murahara
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Tokai Univ., 1117 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa, 259-12, Japan
H. Arai
Affiliation:
Central Glass Corporation, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, Japan
T. Matsumura
Affiliation:
Iwatani Corporation, Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Resistless photoetching of SiC was performed by using XeF and KrF excimer laser beams. In this method, ClF3 gas was used for etchant. C1F3 gas has a unique absorption band in the range of 300- 430 nm. The strongest absorption band corresponds to the wavelength of the XeF laser (350 nm). So C1F3 gas is decomposed effectively. On the other hand, the absorption factor of SiC is about 30% in the range of 200-400 nm, and the bonding energy of SiC is lower than the photon energy of the KrF laser beam. For these reasons, it is possible to cut the bond of SiC directly. Thus, two laser beams were used. Fluence of the KrF laser beam was 200 mJ/cm2, of the XeF, 50 mJ/cm2. Total flow rates through the cell were 0.05 1/min. We can fabricated the etched feature of reticle pattern by reductive projection. Line and space was 10 μm and etching rate was 50Å/pulse.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sekine, M., Okano, H., Yamabe, K., Hayasaka, N. and Horiiki, Y. in “Dry Process” (Proc. 6th Symp. Inst. Electr. Eng., Tokyo, 1984) p.74.Google Scholar
2. Chuang, T. J., “Laser-Controlled Chemical Processing of Surfaces” ed. by Johnson, A. W., Ehrlich, D. J., Schlossberg, H. R., (North-Holland, NY 1984) p. 18.Google Scholar
3. Flamm, Daniel L., Wang, David N. K., and Maydan, Dan, J. Electrochm. Soc., 129(12), 2757(1982)Google Scholar
4. Ibbotson, D. E., Mucha, J. A., Flamm, D. L, and Cook, J. M., J. Appl. Phys. 56(10), 2939(1984).Google Scholar
5. Ibbotson, D. E., Mucha, J. A., Flamm, D. L., and Cook, J. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 46(8), 794(1985).Google Scholar
6. Asahara, S., Sakai, A., Matsumura, T., Arai, H., and Murahara, M., Extended Abstract of the 48th Autumn Meeting of the Japan Society of Applied Physics, 682(1987).Google Scholar
7. Asahara, S., Matsumura, T., Arai, H., and Murahara, M., Extended Abstract of the 35th Spring Meeting of the Japan Society of Applied Physics, 527(1987).Google Scholar
8. Murahara, M. and Toyoda, K., Springer Series in Chemical Physics 39, 252(1984).Google Scholar