Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:12:46.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimation of Ra Concentration in High-level Radioactive Waste Disposal System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Yasushi Yoshida  and
Hideki Yoshikawa
Yasushi Yoshida
Affiliation:
[email protected], Inspection Development Corporation, Tokaimura, Ibaraki, Japan
Hideki Yoshikawa
Affiliation:
[email protected], Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Geological Isolation Reserch and Development Directorate, Tokaimura, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Concentrations of Ra in groundwater was thought to be affected by substitution reactions with alkaline earth elements contained in a mineral, because the concentration of Ra is less than the solubility of known Ra containing phases. The substitution reaction was simulated using a partition coefficient. Calcite is a dominant mineral to react with Ra in a geological disposal system. However, previous identification of reactive layers of calcite or reversibility of the substitution reaction has not been confirmed. A re-distribution experiment was therefore undertaken and it was found that an estimated 21±13 layers near the surface were reactive and within them substitution equilibrium was achieved. Using these results, a model to estimate Ra concentration was established and adopted to analyze Ra migration. The effects of substitution of Ra and Ca were reasonably simulated.

Keywords

RaCachemical substitution
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1124: Symposium Q – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXII , 2008 , 1124-Q07-18
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

1. Berner, U., PSI Bericht Nr. 95–07, (1995).Google Scholar
2. Berner, U., PSI Bericht Nr. 02–22 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Azuma, J., Shibata, M., Yui, M., Shibutani, T., Notoya, S. and Yoshida, Y., JNC TN8400 99–071 (1999), in Japanese.Google Scholar
4. Lorens, R.B., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 45, 553–561 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Tesoriero, A.J. and Pankow, J.F., Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 1053–1063 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Curti, E., PSI-Bericht Nr. 97–10 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Yoshida, Y., Yoshikawa, H. and Nakanishi, T., Geochem. J. 42, 295–304 (2008).Google Scholar
8. Cherniak, D.J., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 61, 4173–4179 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute, JNC TN1410 2000–004 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Klein, C. and Hurlbut, C. S. Jr, Manual of mineralogy twenty-first edition, revised, JOHN WILEY&SONS, INC., NEW YORK (1993).Google Scholar
11. Yoshida, Y. and Yoshikawa, H., JAEA-Research 2008–015 (2008), in Japanese.Google Scholar
12. Shannon, R.D., Acta Cryst. A 32, 751–767 (1976).Google Scholar
13. Sverjensky, D.A. and Molling, P.A., Nature 356, 231–234 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Oda, C., Shibata, M. and Yui, M., JNC TN8400 99–078 (1999), in Japanese.Google Scholar
15. Ito, M., Okamoto, M., Shibata, M., Shibata, Y., Danbara, T., Suzuki, K., Watanabe, T., PNC TN8430 93–003 (1993), in Japanese.Google Scholar
16. Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute, JNC TN1410 2000–003 (2000).Google Scholar
17. Murakami, T. and Ewing, R.C. in Experimental Studies on the Interaction of Groundwater with Bentonite, entitled by Sasaki, Y., Shibata, M., Yui, M. and Ishikawa, H., (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 353, Kyoto, 1994) pp.337–344.Google Scholar
18. Tachi, Y., Shibutani, T., Sato, M. and Yui, M., J. Contam. Hydrol. 47, 171–186 (2001).Google Scholar