Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:00:50.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energies and Atomic Structures of Grain Boundaries in Silicon: Comparison Between Tilt and Twist Boundaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M. Kohyama ,
R. Yamamoto  and
Y. Watanabe
M. Kohyama
Affiliation:
Department of Material Physics, Osaka National Research Institute, AIST, 1-8-31, Midorigaoka, Ikeda, Osaka 563, Japan.
R. Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, 7-22-1, Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 106, Japan.
Y. Watanabe
Affiliation:
Cray Research Japan Ltd., 6-4, Ichiban-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102, Japan.
Get access

Abstract

The energies and atomic structures of tilt and twist boundaries in Si have been examined by using the tight-binding electronic theory, and the reason why twist boundaries are seldom found in polycrystalline Si has been investigated. About the frequently observed {122} Σ=9 and {255} Σ=27 tilt boundaries, the configurations without any coordination defects consistent with the electron microscopy observations have relatively small interfacial energies with small bond distortions. About the <111> Σ=7, <011> Σ=3 and <001> Σ = 5 twist boundaries, the configurations contain larger bond distortions or more coordination defects, and much larger interfacial energies than those of the tilt boundaries. The <001> twist boundaries have very complex structures as compared with the other twist boundaries, which can be explained by the morphology of the ideal surfaces. The stability of the tilt boundaries in Si can be explained by the viewpoint of the stable structural units consisting of atomic rings.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 343: Symposium H – Polycrystalline Thin Films - Structure, Texture, Properties and Applications , 1994 , 727
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Vaudin, M.D., Cunningham, B. and Ast, D.G., Scripta Met. 17, 191 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Bourret, A. and Bacmann, J.J., Surface Sci. 162, 495 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Elkajbaji, M. and Thibault-Desseaux, J., Phil. Mag. A58, 325 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Thomson, R.E. and Chadi, D.J., Phys. Rev. B29, 889 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. DiVincenzo, D.P., Alerhand, O.L., Schluter, M. and Wilkins, J.W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1925 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Kohyama, M., Kose, S., Kinoshita, M. and Yamamoto, R., J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2, 7809 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Kohyama, M., Yamamoto, R., Watanabe, Y., Ebata, Y. and Kinoshita, M., J. Phys. C21, L695 (1988); A.T. Paxton and A.P. Sutton, Acta Metall. 37, 1693 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Tarnow, E., Dallot, P., Bristowe, P.D., Joannopoulos, J.D., Francis, G.P. and Payne, M.C., Phys. Rev. B42, 3644 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Kohyama, M. and Yamamoto, R., submitted to Phys. Rev. B.Google Scholar
10. Sawada, S., Vacuum 41, 612 (1990); M. Kohyama, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 3, 2193 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Yin, M.T. and Cohen, M.L., Phys. Rev. B29, 6996 (1984).Google Scholar
12. Tomanek, D. and Schluter, M.A., Phys. Rev. B36, 1208 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Stillinger, F.H. and Weber, T.A., Phys. Rev. B31, 5262 (1985).Google Scholar
14. Kohyama, M., Yamamoto, R. and Doyama, M., Phys. Stat. Sol. B137, 11 (1986).Google Scholar
15. Kohyama, M. and Takeda, S., Phys. Rev. B46, 12305 (1992).Google Scholar