Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:28:49.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enabling the Desktop NanoFab with DPN® Pen and Ink Delivery Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Joseph S. Fragala
Affiliation:
[email protected], NanoInk, Inc., MEMS, 215 E. Hacienda Ave, Campbell, CA, 95008, United States, 408-379-9069, 408-379-9072
R. Roger Shile
Affiliation:
[email protected], NanoInk, Inc, MEMS, 215 E. Hacienda Ave, Campbell, CA, 95008, United States
Jason Haaheim
Affiliation:
[email protected], NanoInk, Inc., DPN Applications, 8025 Lamon Ave, Skokie, IL, 60077, United States
Get access

Abstract

Depositing a wide range of materials as nanoscale features onto diverse surfaces with nanometer registration and resolution are challenging requirements for any nanoscale processing system. Dip Pen Nanolithography® (DPN®), a high resolution, scanning probe-based direct-write technology, has emerged as a promising solution for these requirements. Many different materials can be deposited directly using DPN, including alkane thiols, metal salts and nanoparticles, metal oxides, polymers, DNA, and proteins. Indirect deposition allows the creation of many interesting nanostructures. For instance, using MHA may be used to create arrays of antibodies, which then bond specifically to antigens on the surface of viruses or cells, to create cell or virus arrays. The DPN system is designed to allow registration to existing features on a writing substrate via optical alignment or nanoscale alignment using the core AFM platform. This allows, for instance, the nanoscale deposition of sensor materials directly onto monolithic electronic chips with both sensing and circuit features.

To enable the DPN process, novel pen and ink delivery systems have been designed and fabricated using MEMS technology. These MEMS devices bridge the gap between the macro world (instrument) and the nano world (nanoscale patterns). The initial MEMS devices were simple and robust both in design and fabrication to get products into the marketplace quickly. The first MEMS-based DPN device was a passive pen array based on silicon nitride AFM probe technology from Cal Quate's group at Stanford. The next two devices (an inkwell chip and a thermal bimorph active pen) were more complicated and took considerable effort to commercialize. In this work, some of the difficulties in bringing brand new MEMS devices from the prototype stage into production will be shared. The subsequent MEMS products have become even more complicated both in design and fabrication, but the development process has improved as well. For example, the 2D nanoPrintArray has 55,000 pens in one square centimeter for high throughput writing over large areas. The 2D arrays enable templated self assembly of nanostructures giving researchers the ability to control the placement of self assembled features rather than allowing the self assembly to occur randomly.

Applications of DPN technology vary from deposition of DNA or proteins in nanoarrays for disease detection or drug discovery, to deposition of Sol-gel metal oxides for gas sensors, and to additive repair of advanced phase-shifting photomasks.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Piner, R.D., Xu, J., Xu, F., Hong, S., Mirkin, C.A., “Dip-Pen Nanolithography”, Science 283, 661663 (1999).10.1126/science.283.5402.661Google Scholar
2. Mirkin, C.A., “Dip-Pen Nanolithography: Automated Fabrication of Custom Multi-component, Sub-100-Nanometer Surface Architectures,” MRS Bull., 26, 535538 (2001).10.1557/mrs2001.126Google Scholar
3. Zhang, M., Bullen, D., Chung, S-W., Hong, S., Ryu, K., Fan, Z., Mirkin, C., Liu, C., "A MEMS nanoplotter with high-density parallel dip-pen nanolithography probe arrays," Nanotechnology, 13, 212217, (2002).10.1088/0957-4484/13/2/315Google Scholar
4. Bullen, D., Chung, S-W., Wang, X., Zou, J., Mirkin, C., Liu, C., "Parallel dip pennanolithography with arrays of individually addressable cantilevers," Applied Physics Letters, 84, No. 5, 789791, (2004).10.1063/1.1644317Google Scholar
5. Grow, R.J., Minne, S.C., Manalis, S.R., Quate, C.F., “Silicon Nitride Cantilevers with Oxidation Sharpened Tips for Atomic Force Microscopy,” J. MEMS, 11, No. 4, 317321 (2002).Google Scholar
6. Albrecht, T.R., Akamine, S., Carver, T.E., Quate, C.F., “Microfabrication of Cantilever Styli for the Atomic Force Microscope,” J. Vac. Sci. A, (1990)10.1116/1.576520Google Scholar
7. Salaita, K. S., Wang, Y., Fragala, J., Liu, C., Mirkin, C.A., “Massively Parallel Dip-Pen Nanolithography with 55,000-Pen Two-Dimensional Arrays," Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 45, 72207223 (2006).Google Scholar
8. Salaita, K., Lee, S.W., Huang, L., Mirkin, C. A., “Sub-100 nm, Centimeter-Scale, Parallel Dip-Pen Nanolithography,” Small, 1, No. 10, 940945 (2005).10.1002/smll.200500202Google Scholar
9. Salaita, K., Wang, Y., Mirkin, C.A., “Applications of dip-pen nanolithography,” Nature Nanotechnology, 2, 145155 (2007).10.1038/nnano.2007.39Google Scholar