Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:45:54.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Elevated Temperature Response of Silicon Carbide and Boron Reinforced Aluminum and Titanium Metal Matrix Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

M. S. Madhukar ,
A. Fareed ,
J. Awerbuch  and
M. J. Koczak
M. S. Madhukar
Affiliation:
Drexel University, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics
A. Fareed
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Philadelphia, PA 19104
J. Awerbuch
Affiliation:
Drexel University, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics
M. J. Koczak
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access

Abstract

The elevated temperature modulus and strength of aluminum, titanium, and hybrid aluminum/titanium metal matrix composites were investigated. Aluminum (6061-F) and titanium (Ti-6AI-4V) metal matrix composites reinforced with AVCO silicon carbide or boron fibers were vacuum hot pressed and their tensile properties evaluated to temperatures in excess of 300°C. Microstructure, fracture modes and mechanical properties were characterized to assess the effect of fibers and matrix on composite strength and modulus as a function of temperature. Finally, a comparison of specific strength and modulus is provided as a function of temperature. In general, the metal matrix composites exhibited low density (<2.8 g/cm3), high modulus (200 GPa), and strengths equivalent to 1250 MPa at 250–300°C. The effect of fiber orientation on axial stiffness was investigated using boron fiber reinforced aluminum (6061-F).

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 120: Symposium G – High-Temperature/High-Performance Composites , 1988 , 121
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mar, J. W. and Lin, K. Y, , J. of Composite Materials, 11, 405–421 (1977).Google Scholar
2. Pipes, R.B., Wetherhold, R.C., and Gillespie, J.W. Jr., J. of Composite Materials, 13, 148–160, (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Steele, J.H. and Herring, H.W., Failure Modes in Comoosites, Toth, I.J., Ed., The Metallurgical Society of AIME, New York, New York, 1, 343–356, (1972).Google Scholar
4. Johnson, W.S., Bigelow, C.A., and Bakei-EI-Din, Y.A., NASA TP-2187, (1983).Google Scholar
5. Kreider, K.G., Dardi, L. and Prewo, K., AFML-TR-71-204, (1971).Google Scholar
6. Poe, C.C. and Sova, J.A., NASA TP-1 707, (1980).Google Scholar
7. Awerbuch, J. and Hahn, H.T., J. of Composite Materials, 13, 82–107, (1979).Google Scholar
8. Daily, D.D., Prediction of Fracture Toughness for Soecially Orthotrooic Composite Laminates, M. Sc Dissertation, School of Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT), (1974).Google Scholar
9. Wright, M.A., Welch, D., and Jollay, J., Proceedings of First USA-USSR Symosium on Fracture of Comoosite Materials, Sih, G.C. and Tamuzs, V.P. Eds., Riga, USSR, 4–7, (1978), Sijthoff & Noordhoft, 221–238, (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Awerbuch, J., Madhukar, Madhu S., J. of Reinforced Plastics and Composites”, 4, 3–159, (1985).Google Scholar
11. Wright, M.A. and Intwala, B.D., J. of Materials Science, 8, 953–963, (1973).Google Scholar
12. Mondolfo, L.F., Aluminum Alloys: Structures and Properties. Butterworths Publishers Inc., Boston, Mass. (1979).Google Scholar
13. Erasov, V.S., Pirogov, E.N., Konoplenko, V.P., Akimkin, V. A., Marukhin, A.P., Tsirlin, A.M., Shchetilina, E.A., and Balagurova, N.M., Mechanics of Composite Materials, 18, No.2,127–130, (1982).Google Scholar
14. DiCarlo, J.A., Comoosite Materials: Testing and Design (Fourth Conference). ASTM STP 617, American Society of Testing and Materials, 443–465, (1977).Google Scholar