Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:25:46.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrophoretic Deposition of Barium Strontium Titanate Functionally Graded Thick Film Composites for Electronically Scanning Antennas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2011

Bonnie Gersten
Affiliation:
Weapons and Materials Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD 21005-5069, U. S. A.
Jennifer Synowczynski
Affiliation:
Weapons and Materials Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD 21005-5069, U. S. A.
Get access

Abstract

The composition 40 wt% Ba0.55Sr0.45TiO3 (BST) – 60 wt% MgO bulk material was recently found to be a promising candidate as a low loss, tunable material for electronically scanning antennas (ESA). However, due to the high permittivity of the BST-MgO composite impedance mismatch within the antenna could be a source of loss. Electrophoretic deposition (EPD) could be used as a processing tool to develop functionally graded structures tailored to reduce the impedance mismatch without a reduction in the tunability. In addition, EPD could be used in thin or thick films to decrease the required biasing fields. In this study, EPD was used as a method for deposit thick films of BST functionally graded composites. The concentration of the suspension, solvent type, mixed solvent concentrations, bias field, time, particle size of powders and distance between electrodes were studied to control the deposition yield and thickness. SEM or calipers were used to measure deposit thickness. The relative weight ratio of BST to MgO in the suspension was compared to the final structure as measured by EDS.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Sengupta, L. C., Synowczynski, J., and Ngo, E., J. Integ. Ferro., 15, 181 (1997).Google Scholar
[2] Synowczynski, J., Sengupta, L. C., Chiu, L., J. Integ. Ferro., 22, 341 (1998).Google Scholar
[3] Synowczynski, J. and Gersten, B., Army Science Conference Proceedings (2000).Google Scholar
[4] Kingery, W. D., Bowen, H. K., Uhlmann, D. R., Introduction to Ceramics, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976), p. 933 Google Scholar
[5] Sarkar, P., Datta, S. and Nicholson, P. S., Composites Part B, 28B 49 (1997).Google Scholar
[6] Zhao, C., Vleugels, J., Vandeperre, L., Basu, B., Biest, O. Van der, J. of Mat. Sci. Lett., 17[17], 1453 (1998).Google Scholar
[7] Sarkar, P. and Nicholson, P. S., J. Am Ceram. Soc., 79 [8] 1987 (1996).Google Scholar
[8] Hamaker, H. C., Trans. Faraday Soc., 36 279 (1940).Google Scholar
[9] Avgustinik, A. I., J. Appl. Chem., 35 2090 (1962).Google Scholar
[10] Biesheuvel, P. M. and Verweij, H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 82 [6] 1451 (1999).Google Scholar
[11] Ferrari, B., Moreno, R., Sarkar, P., Nicholson, P. S., J. Europ. Ceram. Soc., 20, 99 (2000).Google Scholar
[12] Yamashita, K., Nagai, M., and Umegaki, T., J. Mat. Sci., 332, 6661 (1997).Google Scholar
[13] Lide, D. R., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, (CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio, 2000)Google Scholar
[14] Ashland Chemical Solvent Property Chart (1986)Google Scholar
[15] Powers, R.W., Mitoff, S.P., King, R.N., and Bielawski, J.C., Solid State Ionics, 5, 287 (1981).Google Scholar