Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:45:48.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electronic Properties of Polymer-Fullerene Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

V. Dyakonov ,
I. Riedel ,
C. Deibel ,
J. Parisi ,
C. J. Brabec ,
N. S. Sariciftci  and
J.C. Hummelen
V. Dyakonov
Affiliation:
Faculty of Physics, University of Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany
I. Riedel
Affiliation:
Faculty of Physics, University of Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany
C. Deibel
Affiliation:
Faculty of Physics, University of Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany
J. Parisi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Physics, University of Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany
C. J. Brabec
Affiliation:
Linz Institute for Organic Solar Cells (LIOS), Physical Chemistry, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenbergerstraße 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
N. S. Sariciftci
Affiliation:
Linz Institute for Organic Solar Cells (LIOS), Physical Chemistry, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenbergerstraße 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
J.C. Hummelen
Affiliation:
Stratingh Institute and MSC, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

We studied the electronic transport properties of conjugated polymer/fullerene based solar cells by means of temperature and illumination intensity dependent current-voltage characteristics, admittance spectroscopy and light-induced electron spin resonance. The short-circuit current density increases with temperature at all light illumination intensities applied, i.e., from 100 mW/cm2 to 0.1 mW/cm2 (white light), whereas a temperature independent behavior was expected. An increase of the open-circuit voltage from 850 mV to 940 mV was observed, when cooling down the device from room temperature to 100 K. The fill factor depends strongly on temperature with a positive temperature coefficient in the whole temperature range. In contrast, the light intensity dependence of the fill factor shows a maximum of 52% at intermediate illumination intensities (3 mW/cm2) and decreases subsequently, when increasing the intensity up to 100 mW/cm2. Further studies by admittance spectroscopy revealed two frequency dependent contributions to the device capacitance. One, as we believe, originates from trapping states located at the interface between composite and metal electrode with an activation energy of EA=180 meV, and the other one is from very shallow bulk states with EA=10 meV. The origin of the latter is possibly the thermally activated conductivity. The photo-generation of charge carriers and their fate in these blends have been studied by light-induced electron spin resonance. We can clearly distinguish between photo-generated electrons and holes in the composites due to different spectroscopic splitting factors (g-factors). Additional information on the environmental axial symmetry of the holes located on the polymer chains as well as on a lower, rhombic, symmetry of the electrons located on the methanofullerene molecules has been obtained. The origin of the signals and parameters of the g-tensor have been confirmed from studies on a hole doped polymer.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 665: Symposium C – Electronic, Optical and Optoelectronic Polymers and Oligomers , 2001 , C7.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Yu, G., Gao, J., Hummelen, J. C., Wudl, F., and Heeger, A. J., Science 270, 1789 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Shaheen, S. E., Brabec, C. J., Padinger, F., Fromherz, T., Hummelen, J. C., and Sariciftci, N. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 841 (2001)Google Scholar
3. Gransträm, M, Petritsch, K., Arias, A. C., Lux, A., Andersson, M. R., and Friend, R. H., Nature 395, 257 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Brabec, C. J., Shaheen, S. E., Rispens, M. T., Hummelen, J. C., Janssen, R. A. J., Meissner, D., and Sariciftci, N. S., Proceedings of the QUANTSOL 2001, p. 28, Kirchberg, Austria.Google Scholar
5. Halls, J. J. M., Arias, A. C., MacKenzie, J. D., Wu, W., Inbasekaran, M., Woo, E. P., and Friend, R. H., Adv. Mater. 12, 498 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Sariciftci, N. S., Smilowitz, L., Heeger, A. J., and Wudl, F., Science 258, 1474 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Brabec, C. J., Zerza, G., Cerullo, G., Silvestri, S. De, Luzzati, S., Hummelen, J. C., and Sariciftci, N. S. (unpublished).Google Scholar
8. Nicollian, E. H. and Goetzberger, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 7, 216 (1965).Google Scholar
9. Herberholz, R., Igalson, M., and Schock, H. W., J. Appl. Phys. 83, 318 (1998).Google Scholar
10. Dyakonov, V., Zoriniants, G., Scharber, M., Brabec, C. J., Janssen, R. A. J., Hummelen, J. C., and Sariciftci, N. S., Phys. Rev. B 59, 8019 (1999).Google Scholar
11. Mäbius, K., Z. Naturforsch. 20a, 1093 (1965).Google Scholar
12. Dyakonov, V., Godovsky, D., Parisi, J., Brabec, C. J., Sariciftci, N. S., Hummelen, J. C., Ceuster, J. De, Goovaerts, E., Synth. Met. 1, 8937 (2001).Google Scholar