Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:59:08.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electronic Properties of Modified Surfaces Using Contact and Non-Contact Scanning Probe Microscopy Techniques and SECM.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Aaron K Neufeld
Affiliation:
CSIRO Manufacturing and Infrastructure Technology, PO Box 56 Graham Rd Highett Victoria Australia 3190
Anthony O'Mullane
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry Monash University Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
Alan M Bond
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry Monash University Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Electrochemical experiments with tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) modified electrodes in contact with aqueous copper containing electrolytes leads to the incorporation and expulsion of copper ions. This process occurs concomitantly with nucleation and growth processes and significant crystal fragmentation to produce particles with dimensions of the order of 10's of nanometres. During reduction of TCNQ and intercalation of copper ions, different phases of the semiconducting compound CuTCNQ are formed.[1,2] The preparation of both conducting and insulating substrates coated with electroactive TCNQ and CuTCNQ particles of variable size have been made by dip and spin coating procedures. Results suggest that the phase and hence electronic properties of CuTCNQ is dependent on the size of particles that decorate the electrode surface. Combining atomic force microscope (AFM) based methods that interrogate the morphological and electronic properties of nanometre sized particles with use of a scanning electrochemical microscope (SECM) is a new advance in materials characterisation that has proved highly valuable in understanding the highly complex behaviour of these semi-conducting particles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Neufeld, Aaron K., Madsen, Ian, Bond, Alan M. et al., Chemistry of Materials 15 (19), 3573 (2003).Google Scholar
2. Neufeld, A. K., Monash University, 2003.Google Scholar
3. Duan, Hailing, Cowan, Dwaine O., and Kruger, Jerome, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 173 (Adv. Org. Solid State Mater.), 165 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Gu, N, Yang, X.-M, Sheng, H.-Y et al., Synthetic Metals 71 (1–3), 2221 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Hoagland, J. J., Wang, X. D., and Hipps, K. W., Chemistry of Materials 5 (1), 54 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Kamitsos, E. I. and JrRisen, W. M., Solid State Communications 45 (2), 165 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Potember, R. S., Poehler, T. O., Cowan, D. O. et al., NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 56 (Phys. Chem. Low Dimens. Solids), 419 (1980).Google Scholar
8. Sun, S. Q., Wu, P. J., and Zhu, D. B., Solid State Communications 99 (4), 237 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Heintz, Robert A., Zhao, Hanhua, Ouyang, Xiang et al., Inorganic Chemistry 38 (1), 144 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Heβ, C, Borgwarth, K, Ricken, C et al., Electrochimica Acta 42 (20–22), 3065 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Ammann, E and Mandler, D, Journal of the Electrochemical Society 148 (8), C533 (2001).Google Scholar
12. Mandler, D and Bard, A. J, Journal of the Electrochemical Society 137 (4), 1079 (1990).Google Scholar
13. Mirkin, M. V., Fan, F-RF., and Bard, A. J., Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 328, 47 (1992).Google Scholar