Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:22:04.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electronic and Magnetic Properties of Interstitial 3d Impurities in Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

H. Katayama-Yoshida
Affiliation:
Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, CO 80401
Alex Zunger
Affiliation:
Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, CO 80401
Get access

Abstract

Self-consistent spin-unrestricted all-electron Green's function calculations are reported for the first time for a series of interstitial 3d impurities in silicon. The calculations, performed within the selfinteraction- corrected local-spin-density fromalism show: (i) not all 3d impurities follow Hund's rule: Tio, Ti, Vo, V+ and Co2+ have a low-spin ground state, (ii) the angular momentum part gL of g-value is quenched due to p-d hybridization effects, (iii) covalency explains also the chemical trends in the central hyperfine coupling constants, (iii) chemical trends in donor andacceptor transitions are reproduced and are consistent with a high-spin to lowspin transition at the low-Z end and high-Z end of the 3d series, (iv) A number of predictions are offered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] (a) Ludwig, G. W. and Woodbury, H. H. in, Solid State Phys., edited by Seitz, F. and Turnbull, D. (Academic Press, New York, 1962), Vol. 13, p. 263; H. H. Woodbury and G. W. Ludwig, Phys. Rev. 117, 102 (1960); (b) D. A. Van Wesep and C. A. J. Ammerlaan, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Defects in Semiconductors (The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Pennsylvania 1985), p. 863.Google Scholar
[2] See review by Low, W. and Offenbacher, E. L. in Solid State Physics, edited by Seitz, F. and Turnbull, D. (Academic Press, New York 1965), Vol. 17, p. 135.Google Scholar
[3] Ham, F. S., Phys. Rev. 138, A1727 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Weber, E. R., Appl. Phys. A30, 1 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Fazzio, A., Caldas, M. and Zunger, A., Phys. Rev. B 29, 5999 (1984); 30, 3430 (1984).Google Scholar
[6] Singh, V. and Zunger, A., Phys. Rev. B 31, 3729 (1985).Google Scholar
[7] Katayama-Yoshida, H. and Zunger, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1256 (1984); Phys. Rev. B (In Press, BY2337).Google Scholar
[8] Zunger, A. and Lindefelt, U., Phys. Rev. B 26, 5989 (1982); A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B , 28, 3678 (1983); U. Lindefelt and A. Zunger, J. Phys. C 17, 6047 (1984).Google Scholar
[9] See for example Perdew, J. P. and Zunger, A., Phys. Rev. 8 23, 5048 (1981).Google Scholar
[10] Fazzio, A., Caldas, M. and Zunger, A., Phys. Rev. B (In Press, BB3066).Google Scholar
[11] DeLeo, G. G., Watkins, G. D. and Fowler, W. B., Phys. Rev. B 25, 4972 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] (a) Bernholc, J. and Holzwarth, N. A. W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1451 (1983); B. I. Dunlap, Phys. Rev. A 27, 2217 (1983). (b) D. M. Bylander and L. Kleinman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 889 (1983).Google Scholar
[13] Katayama-Yoshida, H. and Zunger, A., submitted for publications.Google Scholar