Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:45:35.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electron Beam Induced Nanometre Hole Formation and Surface Modification in Al, Si And MgO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Tim J. Bullough
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3BX, England
C. J. Humphreys
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3BX, England
R. W. Devenish
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3BX, England
Get access

Abstract

A wide variety of materials which are normally undamaged when exposed to a lOOkeV electron beam in a conventional transmission electron microscope can be modified on a nanometre scale by the high current density electron probe in a dedicated scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM). A stationary 100keV STEM electron probe can produce holes typically l-5nm diameter through crystalline Al, Si and MgO tens of nanometres in thickness, while a scanned electron beam can smooth surfaces on an atomic scale.

In Al the stationary electron probe in the STEM produces a row of facetted voids along the irradiated volume. The voids grow initially inwards from the electron exit surface, with each void typically 4nm in diameter and 12-24nm in length, separated by equal distances from one another. In contrast, continuous holes 1.2-1.6nm diameter form at the electron exit surface of Si when exposed to the focused electron beam. However, these holes form only at specific randomly distributed points separated from one another by 2-4nm over the surface of crystalline specimens of both n- and p-doped <001> and <111> Si.

Square cross-section holes with widths of about lnm can be formed by the stationary electron probe in MgO crystals. Rastering the probe over a restricted area of MgO initially results in the rapid development of surface islands and channels which are subsequently removed to leave an atomically smooth surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Youngman, R.A., Hobbs, L.W. and Mitchell, T.E., J. de Physique 41, C6-277 (1980)Google Scholar
2 Iseler, G.W., Dawson, H.I., Mehner, A.S. and Kauffman, J.W., Phys. Rev. 146, 468 (1966)Google Scholar
3 Corbett, J.W. and Bourgoin, J.C., in Point Defects in Solids, edited by Crawford, J.H. Jr., and Slifkin, L.M. (Plenum Press, New York, 1975), Vol.2, pp1161 Google Scholar
4 Bond, G.M., Robertson, I.M., Zeides, F.M. and Birnbaum, H.K., Philos. Mag. A, 55 (5), 669 (1987)Google Scholar
5 Reimer, L., Transmission Electron Microscopy. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin and London, 1989)Google Scholar
6 Bradley, C.R., Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-88-48, 66 (1988)Google Scholar
7 Knotek, M.L. and Feibelman, P.J., Surf. Sei., 90, 78 (1979)Google Scholar
8 Walkup, R.E. and Avouris, Ph., Phys. Rev. Lett., 56, 524 (1986)Google Scholar
9 Mochel, M.E., Humphreys, C.J., Eades, J.A., Mochel, J.M. and Petford, A.K., Appl. Phys. Lett., 42, 392 (1983)Google Scholar
10 Berger, S.D., Salisbury, I.G., Milne, R.H., Imeson, D. and Humphreys, C.J., Philos. Mag. B, 55, 341 (1987)Google Scholar
11 Devenish, R.W., Bullough, T.J. and Humphreys, C.J., presented at EMAG 89, London, 1989 (in press)Google Scholar
12 Humphreys, C.J., Bullough, T.J., Devenish, R.W., Maher, D.M. and Turner, P.S., in Proc. 8th Pfefferkorn Conference on Fundamental Beam Interactions with Solids for Microscopy, Microanalysis and Microlithography, Utah, 1989 (in press)Google Scholar