Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:58:27.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electromigration Failure Kinetics in Al Alloy Lines: A Microstructure-Based Constitutive Equation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. H. Kang
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
J. W. Morris Jr.
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
C.-U. Kim
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, University of Texas, Arlington, Texas 76019
Get access

Abstract

In previous work we proposed a simple constitutive equation that describes the electromigration failure kinetics in naturally passivated Al(Cu) quasi-bamboo lines. The time to failure, tf obeys the relation, tf = t0 exp (−l/t0), where t0 and l0 are characteristic constants and l is the length of the polygranular segment that causes failure (which is ordinarily the longest polygranular segment in the line). The present paper gathers the data supporting this relation, which includes tests on lines as-patterned and annealed at low and high temperature, and examines the dependence of the factors t0 and l0 on current density, test temperature, line geometry, and Al2Cu precipitate distribution. The experimental data suggest that to varies geometrically with j, with exponent n ≈ 2.8, and exponentially with T−1, with activation energy of ∼0.69 eV. It also varies with the line width and the distribution of Al2Cu precipitates. On the other hand, l0 is only weakly dependent on current density and temperature, but may vary with the ratio of line width to grain size (w/G).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Attardo, M.J. and Rosenberg, R., J. Appl. Phys. 41, 2381 (1970).10.1063/1.1659233Google Scholar
[2] Kang, S.H., Kim, C., Morris, J.W. Jr., and Genin, F.Y., J. Appl. Phys. 79, 8330 (1996).10.1063/1.362545Google Scholar
[3] Rajagopalan, G., Dryer, M.L., Theodore, N.D., and Cale, T.S., Thin Solid Films 270, 439 (1995).10.1016/0040-6090(96)80074-5Google Scholar
[4] Kang, S.H., Genin, F.Y., Kim, C., and Morris, J.W. Jr., in Materials Reliability Issues in Microelectronics VI, MRS Proc (MRS, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996), Vol. 428, p. 225.Google Scholar
[5] Kim, C. and Morris, J.W. Jr., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 4885 (1993).10.1063/1.353806Google Scholar
[6] Korhonen, M.A., Børgesen, P., Brown, D.D., and Li, C.-Y., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 4995 (1993).10.1063/1.354305Google Scholar
[7] Kang, S.H. and Morris, J.W. Jr., J. Appl. Phys. 82, 196 (1997).10.1063/1.365760Google Scholar
[8] Oates, A.S., J. Appl. Phys. 79, 163 (1996).Google Scholar