Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:00:45.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrical Properties Of Electrospun Poly (Ethylene Oxide) - Polypyrrole Composite Fibers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Bibekananda Sundaray
Affiliation:
V. Subramanian
Affiliation:
Deapartment of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600 036, India
T. Srinivasan Natarajan*
Affiliation:
[email protected], Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Deapartment of Physics, IIT P.O., Chennai, Tamilnadu, 600 036, India, +91-22574860, +91-22574852
*
*Corresponding Author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Electrospinning is a simple method of obtaining polymer fibers with nanometer diameter. The increase in the ratio of surface area to volume in the case of such fibers, make them attractive in applications such as sensors, etc. It is difficult to electrospin Polypyrrole (PPy) directly to form fibers. Hence electrospinning is attempted with a composite formed with PPy and any other insulating polymer such as Polyethylene oxide (PEO), Polystyrene (PS), etc. The concentration of PPy can be varied to improve the electrical or sensing properties of the resulting composite. In the present report, the PEO-PPy composite fibers with different weight percentages (10% to 50% w/w) are prepared by electrospinning process. The fibers obtained are characterized using SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope) and TEM (Transmission Electron Microscopy). I-V Characteristics are studied for single and multiple aligned fibers obtained on gold electrodes. The variation of electrical conductivity with different concentration of PPy is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. MacDiarmid, A.G. Rev. of Mod. Phys., 73, 701 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Heeger, A.J. Synthetic Metals 125, 23 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Bryan Street, G. Handbook of Conducting Polymers vol-1 (Marcel Dekker Inc, New york, 1986) p.263.Google Scholar
4. Formhals, A., US Patent No.1, 975,504 (1934).Google Scholar
5. Doshi, J. and Reneker, D. H., J. Electroststics 35, 151 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Fridrikh, S. V., Yu, J. H., Brenner, M. P. and Rutledge, G. C., Phy. Rev. Let. 90, 144502–1 (2003).Google Scholar
7. Theron, A., Zussman, E. and Yarin, A.L.. Polymer 45, 2017 (2004).Google Scholar
8. Kang, T S, Lee, S.W., Jooand, J., Lee, J.Y. Synthetic Metals 153, 61 (2005).Google Scholar
9. MacDiarmid, A.G., Jones, W.E. Jr, Norris, I.D., Gao, J., Johnson, A.T. Jr, Pinto, N.J., Hones, J., Han, B., Ko, F.K., Okuzaki, H., Llaguno, M. Synthetic Metals 119, 27 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Sundaray, B., Subramanian, V., Natarajan, T. S., Xiang, R., Chang, C and Fann, W Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 1222 (2004).Google Scholar
11. Ezquerra, T. A., Mohammadi, M., Kremer, F., Vilgis, T. and Wegner, G. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 21, 927 (1988).Google Scholar