Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:41:20.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrical Measurements in GaN: Point Defects and Dislocations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

David C. Look
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Research Center, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435
Zhaoqiang Fang
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Research Center, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435
Laura Polenta
Affiliation:
1INFM and Dipartimento di Fisica, University of Bologna, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
Get access

Abstract

Defects can be conveniently categorized into three types: point, line, and areal. In GaN, the important point defects are vacancies and interstitials; the line defects are threading dislocations; and the areal defects are stacking faults. We have used electron irradiation to produce point defects, and temperature-dependent Hall-effect (TDH) and deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS) measurements to study them. The TDH investigation has identified two point defects, an 0.06-eV donor and a deep acceptor, thought to be the N vacancy and interstitial, respectively. The DLTS study has found two point-defect electron traps, at 0.06 eV and 0.9 eV, respectively; the 0.06-eV trap actually has two components, with different capture kinetics. With respect to line defects, the DLTS spectrum in as-grown GaN includes an 0.45-eV electron trap, which has the characteristics of a dislocation, and the TDH measurements show that threading-edge dislocations are acceptor-like in n-type GaN. Finally, in samples grown by the hydride vapor phase technique, TDH measurements indicate a strongly n-type region at the GaN/Al2O3 interface, which may be associated with stacking faults. All of the defects discussed above can have an influence on the dc and/or ac conductivity of GaN.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Maruska, H. P. and Tietjen, J.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 15, 327 1969.Google Scholar
2. Look, D.C., Reynolds, D.C., Hemsky, J.W., Sizelove, J.R., Jones, R.L., and Molnar, R.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2273 1997.Google Scholar
3. Neugebauer, J. and Walle, C. G. Van de, Phys. Rev. B 50, 8067 1994.Google Scholar
4. Evoy, S., Craighead, H.G., Keller, S., Mishra, U.K., and DenBaars, S.P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 17, 29 1999.Google Scholar
5. Mukai, T., Takekawa, K., and Nakamura, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 37, L839 1998.Google Scholar
6. Look, D.C. and Sizelove, J.R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1237 1999.Google Scholar
7. Auret, F.D., Goodman, S.A., Koschnick, F.K., Spaeth, J-M., Beaumont, B., and Gibart, P., Appl.Phys. Lett. 73, 3745 1998.Google Scholar
8. Fang, Z-Q., Hemsky, J.W., Look, D.C., and Mack, M.P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 448 1998.Google Scholar
9. Romano, L.T., Krusor, B.S., and Molnar, R.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2283 1997.Google Scholar
10. Stampfl, C. and Walle, C.G. Van de, Phys. Rev. B 57, R15052 1998.Google Scholar
11. Look, D.C. and Molnar, R.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 3377 1997.Google Scholar
12. Keller, S., Keller, B.P., Wu, Y-F., Heying, B., Kapolnek, D., Speck, J. S., Mishra, U. K., and DenBaars, S. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 1525 1996.Google Scholar
13. Wright, A.F. and Grossner, U., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2751 1998.Google Scholar
14. Leung, K., Wright, A.F., and Stechel, E.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 2495 1999.Google Scholar
15. Bandie, Z.Z, McGill, T.C. and Ikonic, Z., Phys. Rev. B 56, 3564 1997.Google Scholar
16. Agullo-Lopez, F., Catlow, C.R.A., and Townsend, P.D., Point Defects in Materials, (Academic, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
17. Auret, F.D., Goodman, S.A., Koschnick, F.K., Spaeth, J-M., Beaumont, B., and Gibart, P., Appl.Phys. Lett. 74, 407 1999.Google Scholar
18. Auret, F.D., Goodman, S.A., Koschnick, F.K., Spaeth, J-M., Beaumont, B., and Gibart, P., Appl.Phys. Lett. 74, 2173 1999.Google Scholar
19. Polenta, L., Fang, Z-Q., and Look, D.C., 1999 (unpublished).Google Scholar
20. Look, D.C., Hemsky, J.W., and Sizelove, J.R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2552 1999.Google Scholar
21. Fang, Z-Q., Look, D.C., Kim, W., Fan, Z., Botchkarev, A., and Morkoç, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 2277 1999.Google Scholar
22. Linde, M., Uftring, S.J., Watkins, G.D., Härle, V., and Scholz, F., Phys. Rev. B 55, R10177 1997.Google Scholar
23. Saarinen, K., Nissilä, J., Hautojärvi, P., Likonen, J., Suski, T., Grzegory, I., Lucznik, B., and Porowski, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 2441 1999.Google Scholar