Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:56:14.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Waste Composition and Loading on the Chemical Durability of a Borosilicate Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

D.E. Clark ,
C.A. Maurer ,
A.R. Jurgensen  and
L. Urwongse
D.E. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.
C.A. Maurer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.
A.R. Jurgensen
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.
L. Urwongse
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.
Get access

Abstract

The effects of waste composition and percent loading in a borosilicate glass designed for US defense high level wastes (HLW) have been evaluated. Three types of simulated wastes were investigated; high alumina, high iron and a composite representative of an average waste composition from Savannah River Plant (SRP) waste tanks. Corrosion resistance of the borosilicate glass is significantly enhanced by the presence of any of the three types of wastes. Additionally, corrosion resistance is improved as the % waste loading is increased in the glass. The best corrosion performance was obtained with the high alumina waste in deionized water.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 11: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management V , 1981 , 1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. El-Shamy, T.M. and Douglas, R.W. (1972), Glass Technol., 13(3), 77-80.Google Scholar
2. Clark, D.E., Pantano, C.G. Jr and Hench, L.L., (1979), Corrosion of Glass, Magazines for Industry, Inc, New York.Google Scholar
3. El-Shamy, T.M., Lewins, J. and Douglas, R.W., (1972), Glass Technol., 13(3), 81-87.Google Scholar
4. Chao, Y. and Clark, D.E., in preparation.Google Scholar
5. Clark, D.E. and Lue Yen-Bower, E., (1980), Surf. Science, 100(1), 53-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Materials Characterization Center, 1982, DOE/TIC-11400, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.Google Scholar
7. Hench, L.L. and Clark, D.E., October 1981, Annual Report to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Contract No. NRC-04-78-252.Google Scholar
8. Private communication.Google Scholar
9. American Nuclear Society, American Nuclear Society Standards Subcommittee 16.1 (April, 1981).Google Scholar
1O. Paul, A., Mater, J., (1977), Sci., 12, 2246-2268.Google Scholar
11. Dilmore, M.F., Clark, D.E. and Hench, L.L., (1978), Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 57(11), 1040-1045.Google Scholar
12. Paul, A. and Zaman, M.S., Mater, J., (1978), Sci., 13, 1499-1502.10.1007/BF00553205CrossRefGoogle Scholar