Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:30:58.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Volatilization on Groundwater Chemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

A. L. Pulvirenti
Affiliation:
The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064
K. M. Needham
Affiliation:
The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064
M. A. Adel-Hadadi
Affiliation:
The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064
E. J. Bishop
Affiliation:
The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064
A. Barkatt
Affiliation:
The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064
C. R. Marks
Affiliation:
Dominion Engineering, Inc.,11730 Plaza America Drive, Reston, VA 20190
J. A. Gorman
Affiliation:
Dominion Engineering, Inc.,11730 Plaza America Drive, Reston, VA 20190
Get access

Abstract

Both concentrated and dilute simulated solutions of saturated J13 and unsaturated UZ pore water were concentrated through distillation of the solutions under atmospheric pressure. It was observed that condensed vapors from the pH of J13 waters steadily rose during the distillations to a value of 10, while the pH of UZ waters remained steady until 90% of the volume of the solution had been distilled, after which the pH of the condensed vapors dropped precipitously, often below 1. Residual solutions analyzed when most of the solution had been distilled away were also found to be extremely acidic. The temperature of these residual solutions was around 144°C due to their high solute content causing boiling point elevation. All experiments were performed with the condenser open to ambient air at atmospheric pressure. The pH drop during the distillation of UZ water is attributed largely to the presence of large amounts of magnesium. Specimens of Alloy 22 tested in the residual solutions of at their boiling temperature (around 144°C) showed significant rates of general corrosion over a broad range, often approaching 1 mm/year. Similarly high corrosion rates were also observed in tests on Alloy 22 specimens in condensates obtained during the late stages of the distillation. These tests were performed either in situ at 75–80°C using a Soxhlet extractor, or in separate pressure vessels at temperatures between 90 and 130°C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rosenberg, N. D., Gdowski, G. E. and Knauss, K. G., “Evaporative Chemical Evolution of Natural Waters at Yucca Mountain, Nevada“, Appl. Geochem., 16, 12311240 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Yang, I. C., Rattray, G. W. and Yu, P., “Interpretation of Chemical and Isotopic Data from Boreholes in the Unsaturated Zone at Yucca Mountain, Nevada”, Water-Resources Report 96–4058, U. S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, 1996.Google Scholar
3. Peterman, Z. E. and Marshall, B. D., “Geochemistry of Pore Water from Densely Welded Topopah Spring Tuff at Yucca Mountain, Nevada“, The Geological Society of America, 2002 Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, October 2730, 2002, Paper No. 137–2.Google Scholar
4. Krumhansl, J. L., “Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Brine Field pH Measurements: Technique and Interpretation“, SAND88–3352, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1989.Google Scholar
5. Dunnington, F. P. and Smither, F. W., “Drying and Deliquescence of Certain Salts“, Am. J. Chem., 19, 227232 (1897).Google Scholar
6. Songa, T., Careri, G., Casarini, G. and Giannini, F., “Corrosion and Self-Protection of Carbon Steel in Hot Saline Solutions“, EUR-5864EN, Comm. European Communities, Luxembourg, 1977.Google Scholar