Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:32:36.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Structural Disorder on the Electronic Properties of Silicon: Tight-Binding Calculations of Grain Boundaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1993

M. Kohyama
Affiliation:
Glass and Ceramic Material Department, Government Industrial Research Institute, Osaka, 1-8-31, Midorigaoka, Ikeda, Osaka 563, Japan
R. Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, 7-22-1, Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 153, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The atomic and electronic structures of tilt and twist boundaries in Si have been calculated by using the transferable semi-empirical tight-binding (SETB) method, and the relations between the local structural disorder and the electronic properties of Si have been obtained clearly. The odd-membered rings and the four-membered rings induce the changes of the shape of the local density of states (LDOS). The bond distortions generate the peaks at the band edges in the LDOS, and greatly distorted bonds induce the weak-bond states inside the band gap. The three-coordinated defect generates a deep state in the band gap, which is much localized at the three-coordinated atom. The five-coordinated defect generates both deep and shallow states. The deep state is localized in the neighboring atoms except the five-coordinated atom, although the shallow states exist among the five-coordinated atom and the neighboring atoms. Configurations of boundaries are very effective in order to clarify the effects of the local structural disorder in amorphous SI.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Joannopoulos, J.D. and Cohen, M.L., Phys. Rev. B7, 2644 (1973).Google Scholar
2. Joannopoulos, J.D., Phys. Rev. B16, 2764 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Cohen, M.H., Fritzsche, H., Singh, J. and Yonezawa, F., J. Phys. Soc. Japan 49, Suppl. A, 1175 (1980).Google Scholar
4. Pantelides, S.T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2979 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Bose, S.K., Winer, K. and Andersen, O.K., Phys. Rev. B37, 6262 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Fedders, P.A. and Carlsson, A.E., Phys. Rev. B39, 1134 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Biswas, R., Wang, C.Z., Chan, C.T., Ho, K.M. and Soukoulis, C.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1491 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Stich, I., Car, R. and Parrinello, M., Phys. Rev. B44, 11092 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Fedders, P.A., Drabold, D.A. and Klcmm, S., Phys. Rev. B45, 4048 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Kohyama, M., Kose, S. and Yamamoto, R. in Defect Engineering in Semiconductor Growth, Processing and Device Technology, edited by Ashok, S., Chevallier, J., Sumino, K. and Weber, E. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 262, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) pp.567572.Google Scholar
11. Kohyama, M., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 3, 2193 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Kohyama, M., Kose, S., Kinoshita, M. and Yamamoto, R., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 2, 7809 (1990).Google Scholar