Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:20:14.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Sputtering Conditions on Texture, Microstructure and Magnetic Properties of the CoCrPt/NiAl Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Y.-N. Hsu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Data Storage Systems Center
D. E. Laughlin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Data Storage Systems Center
D. N. Lambeth
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Data Storage Systems Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Get access

Abstract

The effects of sputtering argon pressures and sputtering power on the microstructure, texture and magnetic properties of NiAI underlayers on CoCrPt films were investigated. In this paper, the relationship between the sputtering conditions, microstructure, crystallographic texture and magnetic properties of these thin films will be discussed. By controlling the sputtering pressure and sputtering power, the texture and microstructure of NiAI underlayers were found to vary. This in turn was found to influence the magnetic properties of CoCrPt thin films. It was found that 10 mtorr is the optimum pressure to deposit the NiAl thin films to obtain the best magnetic properties for our system. At this argon pressure, the coercivity reached a maximum value because of the strongest CoCrPt (1010) texture and smallest grain size. At lower argon pressures (< 10 mtorr), NiAI tended to have a (110) texture reducing the CoCrPt (1010) texture, which in turn reduced the CoCrPt coercivity and S*. Also, high NiAl deposition pressures (>30 mtorr) yielded larger grains and a weaker CoCrPt (1010) texture, thereby decreasing the coercivity of the CoCrPt films. Increasing the sputtering power has been found to increase the CoCrPt coercivity and S* value. However, the grain sizes of the CoCrPt/NiAl thin films deposited at higher sputtering power were larger than those obtained at lower sputtering power.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Iwasaki, S., Ouchi, K. and Honda, H., IEEE Trans. Mag. 16, p.1111 (1987).10.1109/TMAG.1980.1060861Google Scholar
2. Rogers, D. J., Chapman, J. N., Bemards, J.P.C. and Luitjens, S. B., IEEE Trans. Mag. 25, p.4180 (1989)10.1109/20.42561Google Scholar
3. Johnson, K. E., Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Magnetic Materials, Process, and Devices of the Electrochemical Society 92–10, p.27 (1991)Google Scholar
4. Lin, T. and Yamashita, t., IEEE Trans. Mag. 24, p.2700 (1988)10.1109/20.92094Google Scholar
5. Yogi, T., Tsang, C., Nguyen, T. A., Ju, K., Gorman, G. L. and Castillo, G., IEEE Trans. Mag. 26, p.2271 (1990)10.1109/20.104695Google Scholar
6. Lee, L.-L., Laughlin, D. E. and Lambeth, D. N., IEEE Trans. Mag. 30, p.39513953 (1994)Google Scholar
7. Lee, L.-L., Laughlin, D. E. and Lambeth, D. N., J. Appl. Phys. 81, p.43664368 (1997)10.1063/1.364824Google Scholar