Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:49:42.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Lichens on Uranium Migration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Takeshi Kasama
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Takashi Murakami
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Toshihiko Ohnuki
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Science, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1106, Japan
O. William Purvis
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, England
Get access

Abstract

The lichen Trapelia involuta from uraniferous spoil heaps in Cornwall, England, growing directly on the secondary uranium minerals, metazeunerite and metatorbernite, was examined by field-emission scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy to assess the effect of Trapelia on uranium migration. We observed metazeunerite, sericite and scorodite as well as unidentified Fe-, Pb/As-, Fe/As-, Al/P-, Pb-bearing minerals concentrated in the lichen exciple and medulla. In addition, metazeunerite also occurred in the epithecium. The chemistries, sizes, and occurrences of the above minerals in the lichen suggest that fixation of U as well as Pb, As, Fe, and Al is dependent on lichen physiological processes. We suggest Trapelia accumulates these elements from groundwater and precipitates the above minerals within specific tissues. Our results indicate that some lichens retard uranium migration by accumulating uranium from groundwater and forming uranium-bearing minerals within their tissues.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Beveridge, T.J. and Murray, R.G.E., J. Bact., 141, 876 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Disnar, J.R., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 45, 363 (1981).Google Scholar
3. Beveridge, T.J., Meloche, J.D., Fyfe, W.S., and Murray, R.G.E., Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 45, 1094 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Lorenz, M.G. and Krumbein, W.E., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 21, 374 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Milodowski, A.E., West, J.M., Pearce, J.M., Hyslop, E.K., Basham, I.R., and Hooker, P.J., Nature, 347, 465 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Suzuki, Y. and Banfield, J.F., in Reviews in mineralogy, 38 (eds Burns, P.C. and Finch, R.), pp. 393432 (Mineralogical Society of America, 1999).Google Scholar
7. Nash, T.H., in Lichen Biology (ed Nash, T.H.), 303p (Cambridge, UK, 1996).Google Scholar
8. Haas, J.R., Bailey, E.H., and Purvis, O.W., Am. Mineral., 83, 1494 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Sheard, J.W., Can. J. Bot., 64, 2446 (1985).Google Scholar
10. Sheard, J.W., Can. J. Bot., 64, 2453 (1985).Google Scholar
11. McLean, L., Purvis, O.W., Williamson, B.J., and Bailey, E.H., Nature, 391, 649 (1998).Google Scholar
12. Mann, H. and Fyfe, W.S., Can. J. Earth Sci., 22, 1899 (1985).Google Scholar
13. Gorby, Y.A. and Lovely, D.R., Environ. Sci. Technol., 26, 205 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Macaskie, L.E., Empson, R.M., Cheetham, A.K., Grey, C.P.A., and Skarnuli, J., Science, 257, 782 (1992)Google Scholar
15. Boileau, L.J.R., Nieboer, E., and Richardson, D.H.S., Can. J. Bot., 63, 384 (1985).Google Scholar
16. Baker, W.W., Haas, J.R., Suzuki, Y., and Banfield, J.F., Geol. Soc. Am. Abst., 205 (1998).Google Scholar
17. Gadd, G.M., New Phytologist, 124, 25 (1993).Google Scholar
18. Brown, D.H. and Beckett, R.P., Lichenologist, 16, 173 (1984).Google Scholar
19. Brown, D.H. and Avalos, A., Symbiosis, 11, 299 (1991).Google Scholar