Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:06:37.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Ion Implantation on the Rolling Contact Fatigue of 440C Stainless Steel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

F. M. Kustas ,
M. S. Misra  and
P. Sioshansi
F. M. Kustas
Affiliation:
Martin Marietta Denver Aerospace, P.O. Box 179, Denver CO 80201;
M. S. Misra
Affiliation:
Martin Marietta Denver Aerospace, P.O. Box 179, Denver CO 80201;
P. Sioshansi
Affiliation:
Spire Corporation, Patriots Park, Bedford, MA 01730
Get access

Abstract

Cylindrical 440C stainless steel specimens implanted with N and Ti were examined for their fatigue resistance and wear behavior by rolling contact fatigue (RCF) testing. The results obtained from RCF testing showed a 40% increase in the B-10 fatigue lifetime for N implanted and a 17% increase for Ti implanted 440C specimens compared to baseline, unimplanted 440C. Quantitative surface analysis by Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) was performed to determine the effects of process parameter optimization and ion beam masking on the elemental concentration profiles.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 27: Symposium E – Ion Implantation and Ion Beam Processing of Materials , 1983 , 685
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Singer, I.L., Carosella, C.A. and Reed, J.R., “Friction Behavior of 52100 Steel Modified by Ion Implanted Ti,” in The Use of Ion Implantation for Materials Processing, NRL Memorandum Report 4527, June 24, 1981, pp.53–69.Google Scholar
2. Yost, F.G., et al. , “Friction and Wear of Stainless Steel Implanted with Ti and C,” in Proceedings of Boston Materials Research Society Meeting, Nov. (1981).Google Scholar
3. Hirvonen, J.K., “Ion Implantation in Tribology and Corrosion Science,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 15(5), 1662–1668, (1978).Google Scholar
4. Bamberger, E.N. and Clark, J.C. “Development and Application of the Rolling Contact Fatigue Test Rig,” Rolling Contact Fatigue Testing of Bearing Steels, ASTM STP 771, 85–106, (1982).Google Scholar
5. Carbucicchio, M., Bardani, L. and Tosto, S., “Surface Mössbauer Analysis of 38NCD4 Steel Ion Implanted with Nitrogen,” J. Appl. Phys. 52(7), 4589–4592, (1981).Google Scholar
6. Singer, I.L., Jeffries, R.A., “Surface Chemistry and Friction Behavior of Ti-Implanted 52100 Steel,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1(2), April-June 317–321, (1983).Google Scholar
7. Nelson, G.C., Pope, L.E. and Yost, F.G., “Summary Abstract: Correlation of the Surface Compositon of C and Ti-Ion Implanted Layers in Iron and Stainless Steel with Reduced Friction and Wear,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol.A 1(2), 496, (1983).Google Scholar