Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:38:39.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Inclusions and Porosity on the Indentation Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

E. S. Ege
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, U.S.A.
Y.-L. Shen
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

A combined numerical and experimental study was undertaken to investigate the effect of microstructural heterogeneity on indentation response. Finite element analyses were carried out to simulate the stress-strain behavior and the indentation response of two model heterogeneous systems: one with hard particles embedded within a soft matrix and the other with a pore-containing ductile material. For the particle-containing system, the indentation response consistently overestimates the overall strength of the composite. This is largely due to the localized increase in particle concentration directly underneath the indent. For the porous system, the indentation response consistently underestimates the overall strength due to the pore-crushing effect. Experiments on metal-ceramic composites confirmed the non-correspondence between the indentation and stress-strain responses, even when the indent size is much greater than the microstructural feature size. Implications of the present findings in utilizing indentation to quantify surface mechanical properties are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Fisher-Cripps, A. C., Nanoindentation (Springer Verlag, 2002).Google Scholar
2. Dao, M., Chollacoop, N., Van Vliet, K. J., Venkatesh, T. A. and Suresh, S., Acta Mater. 49, 3899 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Cheng, Y.-T. and Cheng, C.-M., J. Mater. Res. 14, 3493 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Kucharski, S. and Mroz, Z., Mater. Sci. Engng. A 318, 65 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Bolshakov, A., Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M., J. Mater. Res. 11, 760 (1996).Google Scholar
6. ABAQUS, version 6.2, Hibbit, Karlson and Sorensen, Pawtucket, RI.Google Scholar
7. Shen, Y.-L. and Guo, Y. L., Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Engng. 9, 391 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Shen, Y.-L., Williams, J. J., Piotrowski, G., Chawla, N. and Guo, Y. L., Acta Mater. 49, 3219 (2001).Google Scholar