Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:06:58.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Erbium alloying on the structural and piezoelectric properties of Aluminum Nitride thin films annealed under extreme thermal conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2013

V. Narang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-6315, U.S.A
D. Korakakis
Affiliation:
Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
Get access

Abstract

Effects of adding Erbium(Er) to Aluminum Nitride thin films on their structural and piezoelectric are reported along with stability of the films after annealing them at temperatures up to 600° C. The thin films samples were deposited on the (001) p-type silicon substrates by reactive magnetron sputtering, using the Er alloyed Aluminum targets with Er atomic concentrations of 0, 1, 3 and 4% and the magnetron sputtering power of 200 W. The samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). XPS analysis was used to confirm the stoichiometry of AlN phase, Er atomic content and its possible chemical state in the films. Results show that alloying with Er results in higher piezoelectric coefficient d33 as compared to that in Er-free AlN thin films. Structural analysis of the films by XRD shows the shift of (0002) AlN peak to lower 2θ values upon Er doping, indicating the presence of uniform internal compressive stress.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Farrell, R., Pagán, V. R., Kabulski, A., Kuchibhatla, S., Harman, J., Kasarla, K. R., Rodak, L. E., Famouri, P., Hensel, J., and Korakakis, D., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1052, 1052-DD06-18 (2008).Google Scholar
Garg, A. and Agrawal, D. C., Materials Science and Engineering B, 86 134143 (2001).10.1016/S0921-5107(01)00655-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, Y. and Uchino, K., Journal of Applied Physics, 92 20942099 (2002).10.1063/1.1490617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabulski, A., Pagàn, V. R. and Korakakis, D., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1129, 1557/PROC-1129-V09-02 (2008).10.1557/PROC-1129-V09-02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanz-Hervàs, A., Clement, M., Iborra, E., Vergara, L., Olivares, J. and Sangrador, J., Applied Physics Letters, 88, 161915 (2006).10.1063/1.2191425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, C.D., Riggs, W.M., Davis, L. E., Moulder, J. F., Muilenberg, G.E., Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Physical Electronics Division, Eden Prairie, Minn. 55344 (1979)Google Scholar
Uwamino, Y., Ishizuka, Y., Yamatera, H., Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 34, 69, (1984).10.1016/0368-2048(84)80060-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, P., Zhang, J.L., Tan, Y.Q., Wang, C.L., Acta Materialia, 5022, 60 (2012).Google Scholar