Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:39:03.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Environment on Tunneling Spectroscopy of Gold Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

G. C. Wetsel ,
Z. M. Liu ,
T. L. Weng ,
M. W. Gosney  and
R. J. Warmack
G. C. Wetsel
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275
Z. M. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275
T. L. Weng
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275
M. W. Gosney
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275
R. J. Warmack
Affiliation:
Health and Safety Research Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
Get access

Abstract

A scanning tunneling microscope with a tunneling-current dynamic range of four orders of magnitude has been used in tunneling-spectroscopy studies of Au surfaces in moderate vacuum and in various gases at atmospheric pressure. Rapid scans of z-motion transducer voltage (Vz) were measured as a function of tunneling current (It) under computer control. Driftcorrected plots of log(It) versus Vz were essentially linear. The mean barrier potential was determined from the slope of these plots and the measured displacement-versus-Vzcalibration curve. Barrier potentials so determined are compared for different environmental conditions of the Au surface.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 139: Symposium R – High Resolution Microscopy of Materials , 1989 , 303
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Simmons, J. G., J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1793 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. McCord, M. A. and Pease, R. F. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 4, 86 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Mamin, H. J., Ganz, E., Abraham, D. W., Thomson, R. E., and Clarke, J., Phys. Rev. 34, 9015 (1986)Google Scholar
4. Binnig, G. and Smith, D. P. E., Rev. Sci. Instrum., 57, 1688 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Wetsel, G. C., McBride, S. E., Warmack, R. J., and Sands, B. Van de, to be published.Google Scholar
6. Binnig, G., Rohrer, H., Gerber, Ch., and Weibel, E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 40, 178 (1982).Google Scholar