Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:29:42.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effective Hydrogen Separation Using Ion Beam Modified Polymeric Membranes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

M. R. Coleman
Affiliation:
Univ. of Toledo, Dept of Chem. & Env. Eng., Toledo, Ohio.
X. Xu
Affiliation:
Univ. of Toledo, Dept of Chem. & Env. Eng., Toledo, Ohio.
J. Ilconich
Affiliation:
Univ. of Toledo, Dept of Chem. & Env. Eng., Toledo, Ohio.
J. Ritchie
Affiliation:
Univ. of Toledo, Dept of Chem. & Env. Eng., Toledo, Ohio.
L. Hu
Affiliation:
Univ. of Toledo, Dept of Chem. & Env. Eng., Toledo, Ohio.
Get access

Abstract

High purity H2 gas streams are increasingly important for a variety of applications including feed gases for fuel cells. The potential of hydrogen gas as primary energy source has generated considerable interest in hydrogen separation technologies. We have been investigating ion beam irradiation as a method to modify polymeric membranes to enhance both hydrogen permeability and permselectivities. Combined high permeabilities and permselectivities are required to give high recoveries of high purity hydrogen. Ion irradiation typically results in the formation of numerous crosslinks within the polymer matrix that should enable these materials to maintain selectivities at high temperatures and to resist chemical attack. Helium separations over a range of temperatures of irradiated polyimides were used as a model of the hydrogen system. Finally, the impact of irradiation conditions on gas separations in these materials will be addressed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Robeson, L.M., Burgoyne, W.F., Langsam, M., Savoca, A., Tein, C. Polymer, 35, 4970 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Lipscomb, G. G. in The 1996 Membrane Technology Review, Business Communications Co., Norwalk, CT, 1996, pp. 23102.Google Scholar
3. Xu, D., Xu, X. L., Du, G. D., Wang, R. and Zou, S. C., Liu, X. H., Nucl. Instr. and Methods B 81 1063 (1993)Google Scholar
4. Davenas, J., Xu, X. L., Boiteux, G., Sage, D., Nucl. Instr. and Meths B 39 754 (1989)Google Scholar
5. Myler, U., Coleman, M. R., Xu, X. L., and Simpson, P. J.,, J. of Polym. Sci., Part B Polym. Phys., 36 2413 (1998)Google Scholar
6. Xu, X.L., Myler, U., Simpson, P.J., and Coleman, M.R., in Membrane Formation and Modification, ed. Pinnau, and Freeman, B.D., ACS Sympsium Series 744, Washington, D.C., 205227 (2000)Google Scholar
7. Hu., L., Xu., X.L., and Coleman, M.R., accepted by J. of Applied Polymer Science.Google Scholar
8. Ilconich, J., Hu, L., Xu, X., Coleman, M.R., in preparation for submission to Macromolecules.Google Scholar
9. Coleman, M.R. and Koros, W.J., J. Membrane Science, 50, 285 (1990)Google Scholar
10. Husk, G.R., Cassidy, P.E., and Gebert, K.L., Macromolecules, 21 1234 (1988)Google Scholar
11. Ilconich, J., Xu, X.L., and Coleman, M.R., J. Membrane Science, in press.Google Scholar
12. Koros, W.J. and Chern, R.T. in Handbook of Separation Process Techonology, ed. Rousseau, R.W., John Wiley and Sons (1987).Google Scholar