Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:37:29.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Surface Segregation on the Temperature Dependence of Ion-Bombardment Induced Surface Morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

B. Aufray
Affiliation:
CRMC2-CNRS, Campus de Luminy, Marseille, France, [email protected]
H. Giordano
Affiliation:
Laboratoire SERMEC, Université Aix-Marseille III, Marseille, France
V. Petrova
Affiliation:
Center for Microanalysis of Materials, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801
D. N. Seidman
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208
Get access

Abstract

We present a scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) study, performed at different elevated temperatures, on the influence of Sb surface segregation on the morphology of the (111) surface of a Cu-0.45 at.% Sb solid-solution single-crystal; the surface was initially cleaned at room temperature by Ar+ ion sputtering. Unexpectedly, when the temperature is increased from room temperature to 380°C, the typical (111) surface morphology, obtained after sputtering, evolves in two very different manners that depend on the heating rate. If the heating rate is rapid (approximately a few minutes), it evolves to a structure with large terraces, whereas if it is slow (about 10 hours) the morphology does not evolve -- i.e., it is frozen. These unexpected results are interpreted in terms of excess subsurface point defects (vacancies and self-interstitials) created during ion bombardment, which are mobile and can mediate Sb diffusion at low temperatures. This is mainly on step edges, but the point defects can precipitate out of solution, for a rapid heating rate, thereby forming small secondary clusters in the near-surface region, in which Sb atoms are trapped.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kunkel, B., Poelsema, B. Verheij, L.K. and Comsa, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 733 (1990)Google Scholar
2. Girard, J. C., Samson, Y., Gauthier, S., Rousset, S. and Klein, J., Surf. Sci. 302 78 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Michely, T. and Comsa, G., Surf. Sci. 256 217 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Giordano, H., Alem, O., and Aufray, B., Scripta Metall. 28 257 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Aufray, B., Giordano, H. and Seidman, D. N., submitted for publication, 1998.Google Scholar
6. Hansen, M. and Anderko, K., Constitution of Binary Alloys, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1958, pp. 622628 and references therein.Google Scholar
7. Oppo, S., Fiorentini, V. and Scheffler, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 2437 (1993); S. L. Chang, J. M. Wen, P. A. Thiel, S. Gtinther, J. A. Meyer and R. J. Behm, Phys. Rev. B 53 13747 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Bock, W., Gnaser, H., and Oechsner, H., Surf. Sci. 282 333 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Sizmann, R., J. Nucl. Mater. 69–70 386 (1978).Google Scholar
10. Schmid, M., Hebenstreit, W., Varga, P., and Crampin, S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 2298 (1996).Google Scholar