Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:53:24.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Structural Phase Transition on Thermally Activated Time-of-Flight Charge Carrier Mobility and Field Effect Transport in Diindenoperylene Single Crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Ashutosh Kumar Tripathi
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Stuttgart, 3rd Institute of Physics, Pfaffenwaldring 57, Stuttgart, D 70550, Germany
Jens Pflaum
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Stuttgart, 3rd Institute of Physics, Pfaffenwaldring 57, Stuttgart, 70550, Germany
Get access

Abstract

We report on the growth, the structural and the electronic characterization of semiconducting Diindenoperylene (DIP) single crystals. Temperature dependent x-ray measurements reveal a structural phase transition occurring at around 370 K. Temperature dependent time-of-flight (TOF) hole mobility shows a thermally activated behavior up to the phase transition temperature with an activation energy of ∼ 180 meV. A field effect is successfully demonstrated on transistors based on DIP single crystal and yields a room temperature hole mobility of about ∼ 2×10−5 cm2/Vs. Unlike TOF measurements, no electron transport was observed in field-effect transistors (FETs) geometry which could be attributed to the large injection barrier for electrons at the DIP-Ag-contact interface in contrast to the injection barrier for holes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Karl, N., in Organic Electronic Materials, Part II: Low Molecular Weight Organic Solids, edited by Farchioni, R. and Grosso, G., (Springer, Berlin, 2001), pp. 283.Google Scholar
2. Warta, W., Karl, N., Phys. Rev. B, 32, 1172 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Boer, R.W.I. de, Klapwijk, T.M., and Morpurgo, A.F., Appl. Phys. Lett., 83,4345 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Jurchescu, O.D., Baas, J., and Palstra, T.T.M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 84, 3061 (2004).Google Scholar
5. Sundar, V.C., et al., Science, 303, 1644, (2004).Google Scholar
6. Karl, N., Synth. Met. 649, 133, (2003).Google Scholar
7. Sellner, S., et al., Adv. Mater., 16, 1750 (2004).Google Scholar
8. Tripathi, A.K. and Pflaum, J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 89, 082103 (2006).Google Scholar
9. Pflaum, J., Niemax, J., Tripathi, A.K., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 871E, J 7.2 (2005).Google Scholar
10. Kepler, R.G., Phys. Rev., 119, 1226 (1960).Google Scholar
11. Heinrich, M., Pflaum, J., Tripathi, A.K., Steigerwald, M., and Siegrist, T. (unpublished).Google Scholar
12. Dürr, A.C., et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., 81, 2276 (2002).Google Scholar