Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:05:05.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Li3+ Ion Irradiation on Ionic Transport Properties of Complexed Polymer Electrolytes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Prem Narain Gupta
Affiliation:
Govind Kumar Prajapati
Affiliation:
[email protected], Banaras Hindu University, Physics, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Rupesh Roshan
Affiliation:
[email protected], Banaras Hindu University, Physics, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Get access

Abstract

Swift heavy ion (SHI) irradiation effects on ionic conduction in the PVA-H3PO4 polymer electrolyte films have been investigated due to its variety of applications in electrochemical devices. Polymer electrolytes films are irradiated with 50 MeV Li3+ ions having five different fluences viz. 5x1010, 1011, 5x1011, 1012 and 5x1012 ions/cm2. It is observed that irradiation of the polymer electrolyte films with swift heavy ions shows enhancement in conductivity at lower fluences and decrease in conductivity at higher fluences. It appears that below the critical fluence, swift heavy ion irradiation increases the diffusivity of Li+ ion in the polymer electrolyte which provides larger pathways for ionic transport throughout the system. The temperature dependence of electrical conductivity variation has been used to compute the activation energy involved in conduction process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Ratner, M.A., & Shriver, D.F., Chem. Rev. 88, 109 (1988).Google Scholar
2 MacCallum, J.R., Vincent, C.A., Polymer electrolyte reviews, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987).Google Scholar
3 Armand, M.B., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 16, 245 (1986).Google Scholar
4 Wright, P.V., and Parker, J.M., Polymer 14, 589 (1973).Google Scholar
5 Yang, C.C., J. Power Sources 109, 22 (2002).Google Scholar
6 Calcagno, L. and Foti, G., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 19/20, 895 (1987).Google Scholar
7 Guzman, A.M., Carlson, J.D., Bares, J.E. and Pronko, P.P., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 7/8, 468 (1985).Google Scholar
8 Prajapati, G.K., Roshan, R. and Gupta, P.N., J. of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, Communicated, Feb' 2010.Google Scholar
9 Kanjilal, D., Chopra, S., Narayan, M.M., Iyer, I.S., Jha, V., Joshi, R., Dutta, S.K., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 238, 334 (1993).Google Scholar
10 Biersack, J.P., Haggmark, L.G., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 178, 257 (1980).Google Scholar
11 Cohen, M.H., Turnbull, D., J. Chem. Phys. 31, 1164 (1959).Google Scholar
12 Rajendran, S., Uma, T., J. Power Sources 88, 282 (2000).Google Scholar
13 Gaafar, M., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 174 (2001) 507.Google Scholar
14 Lee, E.H., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res, B 151, 29 (1999).Google Scholar
15 Saikia, D., Kumar, A., Singh, F., Avasthi, D.K., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39, 4208 (2006).Google Scholar
16 Lee, E. H., Rao, G R, Lewis, M B and Mansur, L K, J. Mater., Res. 9, 1043 (1994).Google Scholar
17 Lewis, M B, Lee, E H and Rao, G R, J. Nucl. Mater., 211, 46 (1994).Google Scholar
18 Hall, T.M., Wagner, A. and Thompson, L.F., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 3997 (1982).Google Scholar
19 Ramola, R. C., Alqudami, A., Chandra, S., Annapoorni, S., Rana, J. M. S., Sonkawade, R. G., Singh, F., Avasthi, D. K., Radiation effects and Defects in Solids, 163, 139 (2008).Google Scholar
20 Prajapati, G.K., Gupta, P.N., Phase Transitions, 82, 1 (2009).Google Scholar