Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:57:01.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Ion Implantation on the Interdiffusion in Si/Ge Amorphous Artificial Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

B. Park
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
F. Spaepen
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
J. M. Poate
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Road, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
F. Priolo
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Road, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
D. C. Jacobson
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Road, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
C. S. Pai
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Road, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
A. E. White
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Road, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
K. T. Short
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Road, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Get access

Abstract

Amorphous Si/Ge artificial multilayers have been implanted with Si and B at liquid nitrogen temperature, and partially ion mixed with Ar at different temperatures. In all cases, the square of the mixing length was found to be proportional to the dose. Annealing of Si-implanted samples showed that after relaxation the diffusivity appeared unaffected by the implantation process. Annealing of the B-implanted samples showed an enhancement of the diffusivity at the higher dose. The diffusive component of the square of the mixing length in the Ar-ion mixed samples has an Arrhenius-type temperature dependence, with an activation enthalpy of 0.22 eV.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Greer, A.L. and Spaepen, F., in Synthetic Modulated Structures, edited by Chang, L.L. and Giessen, B.C. (Academic Press, New York, 1985) p. 419.Google Scholar
2.Park, B., Spaepen, F., Poate, J.M. and Jacobson, D.C., Beam-Solid Interactions and Transient Processes, edited by Picraux, S.T., Thompson, M.O., Williams, J.S. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 74, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987), pp. 493497.Google Scholar
3.Spaepen, F., Greer, A.L., Kelton, K.F. and Bell, J.L., Rev. Sci. Instr. 56, 1340 (1985).Google Scholar
4.Kadin, A.M. and Keem, J.E., Scripta Metall. 20, 440 (1986).Google Scholar
5.Olson, G.L., Energy Beam-Solid Interactions and Transient Thermal Processing/1984, edited by Biegelsen, D.K., Rozgonyi, G.A., Shank, C.V. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 25, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985), p. 25.Google Scholar
6.Suni, I., Göltz, G., Nicolet, M.-A. and Lau, S.S., Thin Solid Films 93, 171 (1982).Google Scholar
7.Priolo, F., Poate, J.M., Jacobson, D.C., Linnros, J. and Campisano, S.U., to be published.Google Scholar