Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:35:28.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Hydrogenation on the Electrical and Optical Properties of GaSb

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

P.S. Dutta
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India
H.L. Bhat
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India
Vikram Kumar
Affiliation:
Solid State Physics Laboratory, Lucknow Road, Delhi – 110 054, India
Get access

Abstract

The effect of hydrogen plasma treatment on the optical and electrical properties of Gallium Antimonide bulk single crystals is presented. Plasma exposure gives rise to a layer of defects on the surface. These defects introduce multiple trap levels in the band gap from which a slow emission of carriers is observed during the capacitance - voltage measurements. On removal of the defect layer by controlled etching, the effects of hydrogen passivation are seen. The results of optical measurements indicate that passivation of shallow acceptors is more efficient than that of the donors and in general the passivation efficiency depends on the doping level. Passivation of deep levels and extended defects like grain boundaries and dislocations has also been observed. The thermal stability of the passivated deep level and extended defects is higher than that of the shallow level.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pearton, S.J., Corbett, J.W. and Stavola, M., Hydrogen in Crystalline Semiconductors Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992.Google Scholar
2 Chevallier, J., Dautremont-Smith, W.C., Tu, C.W. and Pearton, S.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, p. 108 (1986).Google Scholar
3 Dautremont-Smith, W.C., Lopata, J., Pearton, S.J., Koszi, L.A., Stavola, M. and Swaminathan, V., J. Appl. Phys. 66, p. 1993 (1989).Google Scholar
4 Schutz, R., Matsushita, K., Hartnagel, H.L., Longere, J.Y. and Krawczyk, S.K., Electron. Lett. 26, p. 564 (1990).Google Scholar
5 Balasubramanian, S., Kumar, V. and Balasubramanian, N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, p. 1696 (1994).Google Scholar
6 Milnes, A.G. and Polyakov, A.Y., Solid State Electronics 36, p. 803 (1993).Google Scholar
7 Dutta, P.S., Sangunni, K.S., Bhat, H.L. and Kumar, Vikram, J. Crystal Growth 141, p. 44 (1994).Google Scholar
8 Dutta, P.S., Sangunni, K.S., Bhat, H.L. and Kumar, Vikram, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, p. 1966 (1995).Google Scholar
9 Stievenard, D., Lannoo, M. and Bourgoin, J.C., Solid State Electron. 28, p. 485 (1985).Google Scholar
10 Buglass, J.G., McLean, T.D. and Parker, D.G., J. Electrochem. Soc. 133, p. 2565 (1986).Google Scholar
11 Dutta, P.S., Koteswara Rao, K.S.R., Bhat, H.L. and Kumar, V., Appl. Phys. A 61, p. 149 (1995).Google Scholar
13 Swaminathan, V. and Macrander, A.T., Materials Aspects of GaAs and InP Based Structures Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey, 1991.Google Scholar
14 Nicholas, D.J., Lee, M., Hamilton, B. and Singer, K.E., J. Crystal Growth 81, p. 298 (1987).Google Scholar