Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T12:55:47.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Environmental Chemistry on the Pb Assisted Stress Corrosion Cracking Susceptibility of Mill-Annealed Alloy 22 and GTAW Weldments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Aladar A. Csontos ,
Yi-Ming Pan ,
Darrell S. Dunn ,
Leitai Yang  and
Gustavo A. Cragnolino
Aladar A. Csontos
Affiliation:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mailstop: T7-F3, Washington, DC 20555-0001, USA
Yi-Ming Pan
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238-5166, USA
Darrell S. Dunn
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238-5166, USA
Leitai Yang
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238-5166, USA
Gustavo A. Cragnolino
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238-5166, USA
Get access

Abstract

The susceptibility of mill-annealed (MA) and gas tungsten arc welded (GTAW) Alloy 22 to Pb-assisted stress corrosion cracking (PbSCC) was evaluated in supersaturated PbCl2 and Pb(NO3)2 solutions. The solution chemistries and pH were varied to evaluate the effects of specific Pb-bearing species on the SCC resistance of GTAW Alloy 22 double U-bend samples. Anodic polarization tests in acidic and basic supersaturated Pb(NO3)2 solutions indicated that the passive current densities generally increased with applied potential. These results were then compared to previous anodic polarizations results for supersaturated acidic PbCl2 solutions. Constant deformation SCC tests indicate that MA and GTAW Alloy 22 were resistant to PbSCC in supersaturated PbCl2 (16,000ppm Pb, 95°C, pH 0.5, and Eapplied = -100, -50, 0, and 50mVSCE) and Pb(NO3)2 (16,000ppm Pb, 95°C, pH 3.9 and 10.7 and Eapplied = 50 and 140mVSCE, respectively). The overall results from this PbSCC investigation suggest that MA and GTAW Alloy 22 are resistant to SCC in supersaturated PbCl2 and Pb(NO3)2 solutions at 95°C. Provided that these high Pb concentrations are not attainable in the anticipated repository environments, Alloy 22 is unlikely to be susceptible to SCC by the presence of Pb.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 810: Symposium C – Silicon Front-End Junction Formation-Physics and Technology , 2004 , CC1.11
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pulvirenti, A.L., Needham, K. M., Adel-Hadadi, M. A., Marks, C. R., Gorman, J. A., and Barkatt, A., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXV, Mcgrail, B.P. and Cragnolino, G.A., eds. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 713, Warrendale, PA, 2002) pp. 89–95.Google Scholar
2. Estill, J.C., King, K.J., Fix, D.V., Spurlock, D.G., Hurst, G.A., Gordon, S.R., Mccright, R.D., and Rebak, R.B., Corrosion 2002, Paper No. 535 (NACE Intl., Houston, TX, 2002).Google Scholar
3. Andresen, P.L., Young, L.M., Catlin, G.M., and Emigh, P.W., 2003 TMS Fall Meeting – Effect of Processing on Materials Properties for Nuclear Waste Disposition Conference Proceedings, Met. Trans., ed. Rebak, R., in press, 2004.Google Scholar
4. Pan, Y., Dunn, D.S., Yang, L., and Cragnolino, G.A., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVI, Mcgrail, B.P. and Cragnolino, G.A., eds. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 757, Warrendale, PA, 2003), pp. II4.5.1–8.Google Scholar
5. Csontos, A.A., Pan, Y.M., Dunn, D.S., Yang, L., and Cragnolino, G.A., 2003 TMS Fall Meeting - Effect of Processing on Materials Properties for Nuclear Waste Disposition Conference Proceedings, Met. Trans., ed. Rebak, R., in press, 2004.Google Scholar
6. Perfect, D.L., Faunt, C.C., Steinkampf, W.C., and Turner, A.K., Hydrochemical Data Base for the Death Valley Region, California and Nevada, Open-File Report 94-305 (U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, 1995).Google Scholar
7. Wolf, S.F., Argonne National Laboratory J-13/EJ-13 Compositional Analysis, email correspondence, 2000.Google Scholar
8. ASTM Standard Practice G30-97. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Vol. 03.02 (ASTM Intl., West Conshohocken, PA, 2001).Google Scholar
9. Dunn, D.S., Pan, Y.-M., and Cragnolino, G.A., Corrosion 2000, Paper No. 206 (NACE Intl., Houston, TX, 2000).Google Scholar
10. Yang, L., Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses Software Validation Report for Environmental Simulation Program Version 6.6 Corrosion Simulation Program Version 2.3, Environmental Simulation Program for Concentrated Brines (ESPCB) Version 7.0 Alfa, and Streamanalyzer 1.2, December, 2003.Google Scholar