Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:55:38.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Doping on the Structural and Optical Properties of Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of ZnSe@ZnS Core-Shell Quantum Dots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Sonia J Bailon-Ruiz
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Puerto Rico, Chemistry, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico
Oscar Perales-Perez
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Puerto Rico, Department of Engineering Science & Materials, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico
Surinder P Singh
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Puerto Rico, Department of Engineering Science & Materials, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico
Paul M Voyles
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Wisconsin at Madison, Materials Science and Engineering, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Get access

Abstract

Pure and Cu-doped quantum dots of ZnSe@ZnS were synthesized in aqueous phase using microwave irradiation at 140 °C. X-ray diffraction analyses suggested the development of a ZnSe-ZnS structure. UV-vis measurements evidenced that the presence of Cu species in quantum dots caused the blue shift of exciton peaks with respect to pure, i.e. non doped ones. Photoluminescence spectra of quantum dots synthesized at Zn/Cu mole ratios of 1/0.001 and 1/0.005 exhibited a very strong emission peak centered on ˜ 515 nm. On the contrary, a weak emission peak was observed at 412 nm in pure ZnSe@ZnS quantum dots. The observed emission at 515 nm was attributed to the internal doping of Cu species, which should have induced d-d transitions in the host lattice. Quenching of the luminescence at 515 nm was observed for nominal Cu concentrations above 0.005 mM.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Yuan, J., Guo, W., Yang, X., and Wang, E., Anal. Chem. 81, 362 (2009).Google Scholar
2 Dai, Q., Xiao, N., Ning, J., Li, C., Li, D., Zou, B., Yu, W., Kan, S., Chen, H., Liu, B., and Zou, G., J. Phys. Chem. C112, 7567 (2008).Google Scholar
3 Norris, D. J., Efros, A. L., and Erwin, S. C., Science. 319, 1776 (2008).Google Scholar
4 Pradhan, N., and Peng, X., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 3339 (2007).Google Scholar
5 Mahamuni, S., Lad, A., and Patole, S., J. Phys. Chem. C112, 2271 (2008).Google Scholar
6 Yu, W. W., Chang, E., Drezek, R., and Colvin, V. L., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 348, 782 (2006).Google Scholar
7 Qian, H., Qiu, X., Li, L., and Ren, J., J. Phys. Chem. B110, 9037 (2006).Google Scholar
8 Xie, R., Kolb, U., Li, J., Basche, T., and Mews, A., J. Amer. Chem. Society. 127, 7484 (2005).Google Scholar
9 Deng, Z., Lie, F. L., Shen, S., Ghosh, I., Mansuripur, M., and Muscat, A. J., Langmuir. 25, 435 (2009).Google Scholar
10 Tauc, J., “Amorphous and liquid semiconductors”, New York (Plenum Press 1974) pp 159.Google Scholar
11 Dabbousi, B.O., Rodriguez-Viejo, J., Mikulec, F.V., Heine, J.R., Mattoussi, H., Ober, R., Jensen, K. F., and Bawendi, M. G., J. Phys. Chem. B101, 9473 (1997).Google Scholar
12 Han, J., Zhang, H., Tang, Y., Liu, Y., Yao, X., and Yang, B., J. Phys. Chem. C113, 7505 (2009).Google Scholar
13 Emin, S. M., Sogoshi, N., Nakabayashi, S., Fujihara, T., and Dushkin, C. D., J. Phys. Chem. C113, 4000 (2009).Google Scholar
14 Peng, W. Q., Cong, G. W., Qu, S.C., and Wang, Z. G., Opt. Mater. 29, 317 (2006).Google Scholar