Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:57:40.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dissociation of H2O molecule adsorbed on Si (001) 2×1 surface: a theoretical study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Hyun-Chul Oh
Affiliation:
[email protected], Korea University of Technology and Education, Department of Materials Engineering, Chonan, Korea, Republic of
Hwa-Il Seo
Affiliation:
[email protected], Korea University of Technology and Education, School of Information Technology, Chonan, Korea, Republic of
Yeong-Cheol Kim
Affiliation:
[email protected], Korea University of Technology and Education, Department of Materials Engineering, Chonan, Korea, Republic of
Get access

Abstract

The adsorption and dissociation behavior of water molecule below and above the critical dissociation temperatures were studied by first principles calculations. We found that water-molecule adsorption (surface coverage, θ=0.25) on the down Si atom of a Si dimer in two dimers surface model was 0.26 eV more favorable than that on the up Si atom. The activation energies of water molecule on the down Si atom for interdimer and intradimer dissociations were 0.17 eV and 0.20 eV, respectively. Due to the lower activation energy, the water molecule splits into H and OH immediately once it adsorbs on down Si atom of the Si (001) surface at room temperature. There were three different adsorption sites among four sites of the two dimers for the second water molecule (θ=0.5): one was preoccupied by OH of the first water molecule; up Si atom of the same-dimer with 76.3 % probability, up Si atom of the adjacent-dimer with 23.6 % probability, and down Si atom of the adjacent-dimer with 0.1 % probability. Thus, ½ monolayer of OH sites on the Si (001) surface are irregularly distributed when water molecules are adsorbed and dissociated at room temperature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mathew, A., Wielunski, L. S., Opila, R. L., and Willis, B. G. ECS Transactions, 11 (4) 183 (2007).Google Scholar
2. Green, L., Ho, M. -Y., Busch, B., Wilk, G. D., Sorsch, T., Conard, T., Brijs, B., Vandervorst, W., Raisanen, P. I., Muller, D., Bude, M., and Grazul, J., J. Appl. Phys., 92(12), 7168 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Kresse, G. and Hafner, J., Phys. Rev. B, 47, 558 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Kresse, G. and Furthmüller, J., Comput. Mat. Sci., 6, 15 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Kresse, G. and Furthmüller, J., Phys. Rev. B, 54, 11169 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Kresse, G. and Hafner, J., J. Phys. C: Cond. Mat., 6, 8245 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Vanderbilt, D., Phys. Rev. B, 41, 7892 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Wood Alex Zunger, D. M., J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 18, 1343 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Pulay, P., Chem. Phys., 73, 393 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Cho, J. -H., Kim, K. S., Lee, S. -H., and Kang, M. -H., Physical Review B, 61(7), 4503 (2000).Google Scholar
12. Sheppard, D., Terrell, R., and Henkelman, G., J. Chem. Phys. 128, 134106 (2008).Google Scholar