Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:21:12.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dislocation Nucleation and Multiplication During Nanoindentation Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A. B. Mann  and
J. B. Pethica
A. B. Mann
Affiliation:
Oxford University, Dept. of Materials, Parks Road, Oxford, OXI 3PH, UK.
J. B. Pethica
Affiliation:
Oxford University, Dept. of Materials, Parks Road, Oxford, OXI 3PH, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Small volumes of crystalline material can exhibit near theoretical lattice strengths due to the absence of pre-existing defects. We show here that careful control of experimental parameters and surface preparation are important in observing these increased stresses. In particular, tip impact kinetic energies at the initial contact of only a few eV have been found to influence events occurring at a much later stage in the loading cycle. This can be understood in terms of the energy required to deform a small number of atomic scale asperities and thus release sufficient surface energy to permit dislocation nucleation at impact. If the K.E. is not sufficient to overcome the asperities, dislocations must be nucleated at a later stage in the loading cycle, giving a apparently different mechanical property. We outline the implications for thin film systems where a hard surface layer may play a vital role, firstly, in preventing dislocation nucleation on impact and, secondly, in impeding the propagation of any such dislocations into the bulk below.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 436: Symposium CC – Thin Films Stresses and Mechanical Properties VI , 1996 , 153
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Page, T.F., Oliver, W.C., McHargue, C.J., J. Mater. Res. 7, 450, (1992).Google Scholar
[2] Mann, A.B., Pethica, J.B., Nix, W.D., Tomiya, S. in Thin Films: Stresses & Mechanical Properties V, edited by Baker, S.P., Borgesen, P., Townsend, P.H., Ross, C.A., and Volkert, C.A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 356, 1995) p. 271.Google Scholar
[3] Venkataraman, S.K., Kohlstedt, D.L., Gerberich, W.W., J. Mater. Res. 8, 685 (1993).Google Scholar
[4] Gerberich, W.W., Venkataraman, S.K., Huang, H.E., Harvey, S.E., Kohlstedt, D.L., Acta. Metall. Mater. 43, 1569, 1995.Google Scholar
[5] Pethica, J.B. and Oliver, W.C. in Thin Films: Stresses & Mechanical Properties, edited by Bravman, J.C., Nix, W.D., Barnett, D.M., and Smith, D.A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 130, 1989) p. 13.Google Scholar
[6] Pethica, J.B., Tabor, D., Surf. Sci. 89, 182 (1979).Google Scholar
[7] Gane, N., Bowden, F.P., J. Appl. Phys. 39, 1432 (1968).Google Scholar
[8] Mann, A.B., Pethica, J.B., Langmuir Accepted 1996,Google Scholar
[9] Oliver, W.C., Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
[10] Pethica, J.B., Oliver, W.C., Physica Scripta T 19, 61 (1987).Google Scholar
[11] Fuller, K.N.G., Tabor, D., Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 345, 367 (1974).Google Scholar
[12] Johnson, K.L., Kendall, K., Roberts, A.D., Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A324, 301 (1971).Google Scholar
[13] Hirth, J.P., Lothe, J., Theory of Dislocations, 2nd Ed. (Wiley, 1982).Google Scholar
[14] Hull, D., Bacon, D.J., Introduction to Dislocations, 3rd Ed. (Pergamon, 1984).Google Scholar
[15] Mann, A.B., Pethica, J.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. Submitted 1996.Google Scholar