Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:44:20.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dislocation Forest Interactions: Simulation and Prediction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

L. K. Wickham
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore Lab, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA 94551 IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
K. W. Schwarz
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
J. S. Stölken
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore Lab, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA 94551
Get access

Abstract

Using linear elastic dislocation dynamics simulations, we show that junction formation between dislocations from various interacting slip systems can be predicted by a simple self-energy calculation. We find that this prediction is robust: dislocation curvature and external stress produce little change in the simulation results for junction formation. One key to this success appears to be a separation of timescales, where movement of the far away dislocation arms (under, for example, external stress) is typically slow compared to the process of making a junction. The self-energy calculation we describe gives a rule for dislocation encounters which should allow a considerable saving in computational effort, allowing one to impose correct interaction outcomes without calculating the interactions in detail. We also find that dislocations often come together under attraction without forming a junction. The resulting “cross-linked” state provides an additional type of connection between dislocations. We include preliminary results on the persistence of junctions and cross-linked states under stress.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] PARAllel NOdal Ibm Dislocation code. In this model, the dislocation cores are able to overlap, because the singularity in dislocation interactions has been softened at separations smaller than 2 core radii. The boundary condition we typically use has each long dislocation arm connected to an infinite half-line of matched slope. The PARANOID code is described in Schwarz, K.W., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 108 (1999), and an earlier reference on this junction work is: L. K. Wickham, K. W. Schwarz, J. S. Stölken, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4574 (1999).Google Scholar
[2] References on other 3D dislocation simulation efforts include: Devincre, B. and Kubin, L. P., Mat. Sci. Eng. A 234–6, 8 (1997); M. Tang, L. P. Kubin, and G. R. Canova, Acta. Mater. 46, 3221 (1998); H. M. Zbib, M. Rhee, and J. P. Hirth, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 40, 113 (1997); and M. Rhee, J. P. Hirth, H. M. Zbib, Acta Metall. 42 2645 (1994).Google Scholar
[3] These can be varied from ±20nm to ±400 nm without much effect.Google Scholar
[4] This was anticipated in Schoeck, G. and Frydman, R., Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 53, 661 (1972).Google Scholar
[5] Herring, C. in The Physics of Powder Metallugy, edited by Kingston, W. E. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1949).Google Scholar