Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:00:54.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct-Write Microfabrication of Single-Chamber Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with Interdigitated Electrodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Melanie Kuhn
Affiliation:
[email protected], École Polytechnique de Montréal, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2900 Boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Pavillon J.A. Bombardier, Local 5039, Montreal, H3T 1J4, Canada
Teko Napporn
Affiliation:
[email protected], École Polytechnique de Montréal, Department of Engineering Physics, 2900 Boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montreal, H3T 1J4, Canada
Michel Meunier
Affiliation:
[email protected], École Polytechnique de Montréal, Department of Engineering Physics, 2900 Boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montreal, H3T 1J4, Canada
Daniel Therriault
Affiliation:
[email protected], École Polytechnique de Montréal, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2900 Boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montreal, H3T 1J4, Canada
Srikar Vengallatore
Affiliation:
[email protected], McGill University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 817 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, H3A 2K6, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Miniaturized single-chamber solid-oxide fuel cells (SC-SOFC) are a promising class of devices for portable power generation required in the operation of distributed networks of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) in harsh environments. The single-face configuration, which consists of interdigitated (comb-like) array of electrodes on an yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) electrolyte substrate, is of particular interest because of the ease of high-temperature microfluidic packaging and integration with MEMS. The primary design consideration for this configuration is the minimization of electrode widths and inter-electrode spacings to dimensions on the order of a few micrometers. This is necessary to minimize polarization resistance and increase fuel cell efficiency. Achieving these geometries using standard microfabrication methods is difficult because of the thickness, porosity, and complex chemistries of the electrodes. Here, we report the development of an innovative and rapid method for manufacturing SC-SOFCs with interdigitated electrodes using robot-controlled direct-writing. The main steps consist of: (i) formation of inks (or suspensions) using anode (NiO-YSZ) and cathode (lanthanum strontium manganite) powders, (ii) pressure-driven extrusion of inks through a micronozzle using a robot-controlled platform, and (iii) sequential sintering to form the fuel cell. The first-generation SC-SOFC device, with electrode widths of 130 μm and inter-electrode spacing of 300 μm, has been manufactured using direct-write microfabrication. The electrodes have been extensively characterized using electron microscopy and x-ray diffraction to assess porosity and to confirm phase identity. The primary process parameters in this approach are the particle size and size distribution, rheological properties of the suspension, extrusion pressure, nozzle size, stage velocity, and sintering conditions. As the first step in the development of detailed process-structure-performance correlations for the fuel cells, we have studied the effects of extrusion pressure (in the range 30-40 bar) and stage velocity (in the range 0.2-2.0 mm/s) on the geometry and size of electrodes, for fixed suspension viscosity and nozzle diameter. An optimal combination of speed and pressure has been identified and catalogued in the form of process maps. Similarly, the particle size distribution of the anode and cathode powders is found to have a significant effect on the microstructure, especially porosity, of the sintered electrodes. The implications of these results for the design of the next generation of SC-SOFC, with reduced electrode dimensions and improved electrochemical performance, will be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Baertsch, C.D., Jensen, K.F., Hertz, J.L., Tuller, H.L., Vengallatore, S.T., Spearing, S.M. andSchmidt, M.A., J. Mater. Res. 19, 2604 (2004).Google Scholar
2. Srikar, V.T., Turner, K.T., Ie, T.Y.A. andSpearing, S.M., J. Power Sources 125, 62 (2004).Google Scholar
3. Nikbin, D., Fuel Cell Review 3, 21 (2006).Google Scholar
4. Hibino, T., Ushiki, K. andKuwahara, Y., Solid State Ionics 91, 69 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Hibino, T., Hashimoto, A., Inoue, T., Tokuno, J., Yoshida, S. andSano, M., Science, 288, 2031 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Napporn, T. W., Morin, F., andMeunier, M., Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 7, A60 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Napporn, T.W., Jacques-Bedard, X., Morin, F. andMeunier, M., J. Electrochem. Soc. 151, A2088 (2004).Google Scholar
8. Shao, Z., Haile, S. M., Ahn, J., Ronney, P. D., Zhan, Z., andBarnett, S. A., Nature, 435, 795 (2005).Google Scholar
9. Ahn, S.-J., Lee, J.-H., Kim, J. andMoon, J., Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 9, A228 (2006).Google Scholar
10. Bieberle-Huetter, A. andTuller, H., J. Electroceram. 16, 151 (2006).Google Scholar
11. Son, J.-W., Ahn, S.-J., Kim, S.M., Kim, H., Choi, S.-H., Moon, J., Kim, H.-R., Kim, S.E., Lee, J.-H., Lee, H.-W. andKim, J. in Fabrication and Operation of Co-Planar Type Single Chamber Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,7th European SOFC Forum, Lucerne, Switzerland, 2006.Google Scholar
12. Hibino, T., Tsunekawa, H., Tanimoto, S., andSano, M., J. Electrochem. Soc. 147, 1338 (2000).Google Scholar
13. Hibino, T., Hashimoto, A., Suzuki, M., Yano, M., Yoshida, S., andSano, M., J. Electrochem. Soc. 149, A195 (2002).Google Scholar
14. Shukla, A. K., Raman, R. K. andScott, K., Fuel Cells 4, 436 (2005).Google Scholar
15. Fleig, J., Tuller, H.L. andMaier, J., Solid State Ionics 174, 261 (2004).Google Scholar
16. Chung, C.-Y., Chung, Y.-C., J. Power Sources 154, 35 (2006).Google Scholar
17. Therriault, D., White, S.R. andLewis, J.A., Nat. Mater. 2, 265 (2003).Google Scholar