Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:49:21.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct observation of polar nanostructures in PLZT ceramics for electrooptic applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

V. V. Shvartsman
Affiliation:
Department of Ceramics and Glass Engineering and Center for Research in Ceramic and Composite Materials (CICECO), University of Aveiro, 3810–193 Aveiro, Portugal
A. Orlova
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Tver State University, 170000 Tver, Russia
D. Kiselev
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Tver State University, 170000 Tver, Russia
A. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Institute of Solid State Physics, University of Latvia, LV-1063 Riga, Latvia
A. L. Kholkin
Affiliation:
Department of Ceramics and Glass Engineering and Center for Research in Ceramic and Composite Materials (CICECO), University of Aveiro, 3810–193 Aveiro, Portugal
Get access

Abstract

Transparent Pb1-yLay(Zr1-xTix)1-y/4O3 (PLZT, y=0.0975, x=0.35) ceramics prepared via hot pressing techniques were studied via piezoelectric force microscopy (PFM). Clear piezoelectric contrast is observed in a cubic relaxor phase indicating spatial distribution of polarization with an average cluster size of about 50 nm. The irregular polarization pattern is associated with the formation of a glassy state, where random electric and stress fields are responsible for the disruption of the long-range ferroelectric order. Local poling of the ceramics resulted in the formation of a stable micron-size domain that could be continuously switched under varying dc bias (local hysteresis loop). The applied voltage of 10–12 Volts was enough to switch relaxor into the ferroelectric state. Fractal and correlation analysis of the observed images is presented. The fractal dimension close to 1.55 is consistent with the random distribution of charge defects in this material. The nature of the observed phenomena is discussed based on the current understanding of relaxor state in PLZT and possible effect of PFM instrumentation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Haertling, G. H., in “Ceramic Materials for Electronics”, 2nd edition, edited by Buchanan, R. C. (Marcel Dekker, NY, 1991), pp.129206.Google Scholar
2. Dai, X., Xu, Z., Li, J.-F., and Vieland, D., J. Appl. Phys. 79, 2023 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Viehland, D., Xu, Z., and Payne, D. A., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 7454 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Haertling, G. E., Ferroelectrics 75, 25 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Gruverman, A., Auciello, O., and Tokumoto, H., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 28, 101 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Munoz, R. C., Vidal, G., Mulsow, M., Lisoni, J. G., Arenas, C., and Concha, A., Phys. Rev. B 62, 4686 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Sinha, S. K., Sirota, E. B., Garoff, S., and Stanley, H. B., Phys. Rev. B 38, 2297 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Shvartsman, V. V., Wojtas, M., Vakhrushev, S., and Kholkin, A. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 785, D4.11 (2004).Google Scholar
9. Russ, J., Fractal Surfaces, Plenum Press, NY, 1994.Google Scholar
10. Feder, J., Fractals, Plenum Press, NY, 1988.Google Scholar